Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fixed Action Patterns01:06

Fixed Action Patterns

16.0K
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
16.0K
F Distribution01:19

F Distribution

8.8K
The F distribution was named after Sir Ronald Fisher, an English statistician. The F statistic is a ratio (a fraction) with two sets of degrees of freedom; one for the numerator and one for the denominator. The F distribution is derived from the Student's t distribution. The values of the F distribution are squares of the corresponding values of the t distribution. One-Way ANOVA expands the t test for comparing more than two groups. The scope of that derivation is beyond the level of this...
8.8K
Behrens–Fisher Test00:57

Behrens–Fisher Test

347
The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
347
Fisher's Exact Test01:08

Fisher's Exact Test

1.4K
Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electroencephalographic Abnormalities in Children with Single Calcified Neurocysticercosis Lesion: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Neurology India·2026
Same author

Efficacy and safety of VPM1002 and Immuvac in preventing tuberculosis: phase 3 randomised clinical trial (PreVenTB trial).

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Effects of 24-Week Almond Supplementation on Executive Function and Processing Speed in Middle-Aged Asian Indians with Prediabetes: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Ferritin iron uptake and oxidation are dynamically modulated by nucleotide phosphate architecture via electrostatic gating.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

BRIDGEing the Gap: Impact of a Short Virtual Course on Delivering Global-Standard Breast Cancer Care in Low-Resource Settings.

World journal of surgery·2025
Same author

Polysomnography and Autonomic Function Signatures of Nocturnal Enuresis: An Observational Study.

Pediatric neurology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Mosaic Zebrafish Transgenesis for Evaluating Enhancer Sequences
07:23

Mosaic Zebrafish Transgenesis for Evaluating Enhancer Sequences

Published on: July 16, 2010

14.4K

Was RA Fisher Right?

Ayush Srivastava1, Anurag Srivastava2, Ravindra M Pandey3

  • 1Army Dental Corps, Indian Army, New Delhi, India.

The Indian Journal of Surgery
|November 2, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a respected medical tool. However, Fisherian randomization may not always balance covariates, leading to the need for adaptive randomization schedules.

Keywords:
Adaptive trialsRA FisherRandomization

More Related Videos

A Ferret Model of Inflammation-sensitized Late Preterm Hypoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
07:36

A Ferret Model of Inflammation-sensitized Late Preterm Hypoxic-ischemic Brain Injury

Published on: November 19, 2019

8.0K
Nitroreductase/Metronidazole-Mediated Ablation and a MATLAB Platform RpEGEN for Studying Regeneration of the Zebrafish Retinal Pigment Epithelium
13:12

Nitroreductase/Metronidazole-Mediated Ablation and a MATLAB Platform RpEGEN for Studying Regeneration of the Zebrafish Retinal Pigment Epithelium

Published on: March 2, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Mosaic Zebrafish Transgenesis for Evaluating Enhancer Sequences
07:23

Mosaic Zebrafish Transgenesis for Evaluating Enhancer Sequences

Published on: July 16, 2010

14.4K
A Ferret Model of Inflammation-sensitized Late Preterm Hypoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
07:36

A Ferret Model of Inflammation-sensitized Late Preterm Hypoxic-ischemic Brain Injury

Published on: November 19, 2019

8.0K
Nitroreductase/Metronidazole-Mediated Ablation and a MATLAB Platform RpEGEN for Studying Regeneration of the Zebrafish Retinal Pigment Epithelium
13:12

Nitroreductase/Metronidazole-Mediated Ablation and a MATLAB Platform RpEGEN for Studying Regeneration of the Zebrafish Retinal Pigment Epithelium

Published on: March 2, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating medical therapies.
  • Sir Ronald A. Fisher developed randomization to ensure balanced comparison groups for unbiased treatment effect assessment.
  • Fisher's principle assumes equal distribution of known and unknown covariates, which is not always achieved in practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the inherent weaknesses in the classical Fisherian concept of randomized controlled trials.
  • To highlight situations where Fisher's randomization assumption of covariate balance may fail.
  • To introduce the rationale behind adaptive randomization schedules.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the Fisherian randomization principle.
  • Review of scenarios where covariate imbalance occurs in RCTs.
  • Discussion of the evolution towards adaptive randomization strategies.

Main Results:

  • Fisher's randomization does not consistently guarantee equal distribution of covariates across groups.
  • Significant covariate imbalance can compromise the validity of treatment effect attribution.
  • Adaptive randomization schedules offer a method to mitigate major imbalances.

Conclusions:

  • The classical Fisherian randomization in RCTs has limitations.
  • Adaptive randomization is necessary to address covariate imbalance and strengthen trial validity.
  • Rethinking randomization is crucial for robust clinical trial methodology.