Brainstem Cavernous Malformations: Surgical Indications Based on Natural History and Surgical Outcomes

Ming-Guo Xie1, Da Li1, Fang-Zhou Guo1

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Dongcheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor; Beijing, People's Republic of China.

World Neurosurgery
|November 4, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs) are rare. Surgery is recommended for aggressive, accessible lesions, but treatment for deep-seated or inaccessible CMs remains controversial.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Vascular Malformations

Background:

  • Cavernous malformations (CMs) are uncommon central nervous system lesions, accounting for 5%-10% of intracranial vascular malformations.
  • Brainstem CMs, ranging from 4%-35% prevalence, pose significant neurosurgical challenges due to their location.
  • Advances in microsurgical techniques have improved treatment outcomes for brainstem CMs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current understanding and treatment strategies for brainstem cavernous malformations.
  • To delineate criteria for surgical intervention versus conservative management of brainstem CMs.
  • To discuss controversial aspects of brainstem CM treatment, including radiosurgery and medication.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of cavernous malformations in the brainstem.
  • Analysis of surgical outcomes and risks associated with brainstem CM treatment.
  • Evaluation of indications for surgical intervention in aggressive or accessible lesions.

Main Results:

  • Surgical outcomes for brainstem CMs have improved, but surgery is increasingly contraindicated due to potential morbidity.
  • Symptomatic lesions on the brainstem surface or accessible via safe entry zones are considered for surgery.
  • Treatment for deep-seated or inaccessible brainstem CMs remains controversial, with limited evidence for alternative therapies.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical intervention for brainstem CMs should be carefully considered, balancing risks and benefits.
  • Aggressive, accessible brainstem CMs may benefit from surgery, while conservative management is preferred for others.
  • Further research is needed to establish optimal treatment strategies for all brainstem CM presentations.

Related Concept Videos