Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrode design and insertional depth-dependent intra-cochlear pressure changes: a model experiment.

P Mittmann1, A Ernst1, I Todt1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology,Head and Neck Surgery,Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin,Germany.

The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
|November 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prenatal exposure to parental smoking and infertility in sons and daughters: a cohort study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Kinaesthetic motor imagery in writer's cramp dystonia reveals writing specific abnormalities in the occipital lobe.

Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Longer survival with precision medicine in late-stage cancer patients.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Emerging Two-Dimensional Conductivity at the Interface between Mott and Band Insulators.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Insight into the electronic structure of the centrosymmetric skyrmion magnet GdRu<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>.

Nanoscale advances·2023
Same author

Long-lived spin waves in a metallic antiferromagnet.

Nature communications·2023
Same journal

Discomfort and Intolerance During 24-Hour Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH Monitoring.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Hand Dominance on Results in the Functional Head Impulse Test.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic value of gross tumour volume in laryngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Surgical Management Of Parapharyngeal Vagal Schwannomas: A Systematic Review And Practical Considerations For Approach Selection.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Novel Use of Lieberman Self-Retainers for Nasal Alar Retraction.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and recovery of taste dysfunction after stapedectomy in otosclerosis: a clinical study of 320 patients.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
See all related articles

Cochlear implant electrode insertion affects intra-cochlear fluid pressure. Different electrode arrays show varying pressure changes, impacting residual hearing preservation during cochlear implant surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Preserving residual hearing is a key objective in cochlear implant surgery.
  • Intra-cochlear fluid pressure significantly impacts residual hearing outcomes.
  • Minimizing pressure fluctuations during cochlear implant procedures is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate intra-cochlear fluid pressure changes during electrode array insertion.
  • To compare pressure dynamics between different cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments utilized an artificial cochlear model with an apical pressure sensor.
  • Two types of electrode arrays (midscalar and lateral wall) were inserted.
  • Pressure peaks (frequency and amplitude) were measured and statistically analyzed across insertion phases.
Keywords:
Cochlear ImplantsHearing LossLabyrinthine Fluids

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both electrode arrays showed increased pressure peak frequency during insertion.
  • Lateral wall arrays exhibited a slight increase in pressure peak amplitude, unlike midscalar arrays.
  • Significant pressure differences were observed in the initial insertion phase for both arrays.

Conclusions:

  • Midscalar and lateral wall electrode arrays demonstrate distinct intra-cochlear fluid pressure responses.
  • Electrode characteristics and insertion technique influence pressure changes.
  • Understanding these pressure dynamics is vital for optimizing cochlear implant outcomes and hearing preservation.