Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

A Simple Dewar/Cryostat for Thermally Equilibrating Samples at Known Temperatures for Accurate Cryogenic Luminescence Measurements
Published on: July 19, 2016
Liquid scintillation counters calibration stability over long timescales.
Pawel Gaca1, Phillip E Warwick1, Ian W Croudace1
1University of Southampton, Ocean & Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH UK.
Annual calibration of liquid scintillation (LS) spectrometers using various radionuclides reveals efficiency variations. This study analyzes 9 years of data to inform optimal calibration frequency for accurate radionuclide analysis.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Science and Instrumentation
- Radiochemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Liquid scintillation spectrometry (LSS) is crucial for analyzing alpha and beta emitting radionuclides.
- Accurate measurements depend on robust calibration of LSS instruments, which is often time-consuming and expensive.
- Calibration frequency for LSS varies significantly among laboratories due to practical and operational factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the variability in efficiency calibrations for 1220 Quantulus spectrometers over a 9-year period.
- To analyze calibration data obtained using a range of radionuclides including 3H, 63Ni, 55Fe, 36Cl, 45Ca, 147Pm, 241Pu, and 99Tc.
- To discuss the implications of observed efficiency variations on the recommended calibration frequency for LSS.
Main Methods:
- Long-term (9-year) monitoring of liquid scintillation spectrometer (1220 Quantulus) efficiency.
- Annual calibration using a diverse set of alpha and beta emitting radionuclides (3H, 63Ni, 55Fe, 36Cl, 45Ca, 147Pm, 241Pu, 99Tc).
- Statistical analysis of calibration efficiency data to identify trends and variations.
Main Results:
- Observed variations in spectrometer efficiency over the 9-year study period.
- Efficiency fluctuations were noted across different radionuclides used for calibration.
- The data provides empirical evidence on the stability and performance of LSS instruments over time.
Conclusions:
- Annual calibration of LSS instruments may not be necessary for all radionuclides, depending on observed stability.
- Understanding efficiency variations can lead to optimized calibration schedules, reducing costs and time.
- This research supports evidence-based decisions for LSS calibration frequency, enhancing measurement accuracy and laboratory efficiency.
More Related Videos
06:08Time-resolved Photophysical Characterization of Triplet-harvesting Organic Compounds at an Oxygen-free Environment Using an iCCD Camera
Published on: December 27, 2018
10:52Radiolabeling and Quantification of Cellular Levels of Phosphoinositides by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-coupled Flow Scintillation
Published on: January 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Glassware Calibration
Volumetric flasks: Volumetric flasks are designed to prepare aqueous solutions of precise volumes accurately with a calibration line on the neck. To calibrate a volumetric flask, it is important to fill it with distilled...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...