Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

268
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
268
Cross-reactivity00:42

Cross-reactivity

33.2K
Overview
33.2K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.1K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.1K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

694
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
694
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.6K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced synaptic plasticity and E/I imbalance drive peripersonal space boundaries expansion in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research·2026
Same author

Peer Support, Stigma and Help-Seeking in the Italian Army: A Qualitative Study.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Exposure to false cardiac feedback alters pain perception and anticipatory cardiac frequency.

eLife·2026
Same author

Breathing Strategies to Influence Perception: Evidence for Interoceptive and Exteroceptive Active Sensing.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Multisensory integration in peripersonal space indexes consciousness states in sleep and disorders of consciousness.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.6K

Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.

Marcello Costantini1, Daniele Migliorati2, Brunella Donno2

  • 1Centre for Brain Science, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK; Laboratory of Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy; Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, Foundation University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.

Cognition
|November 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Expectation enhances multisensory integration. Even when a tactile distractor is absent but expected, the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) is observed, demonstrating the brain

Keywords:
Crossmodal congruency effectPredictive codingSensory expectation

More Related Videos

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.6K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • The brain integrates multisensory input for environmental representation.
  • The role of expectation in multisensory integration remains an active research area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether expectation influences multisensory integration using the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE).

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged visual targets while ignoring tactile distractors.
  • Tactile distractor expectation was manipulated using auditory cues (tones) paired with specific finger stimuli.
  • Control studies examined alternative explanations and confirmed the role of spatial and temporal expectation.

Main Results:

  • The basic crossmodal congruency effect was replicated.
  • A reduced CCE was observed even when tactile distractors were omitted but expected.
  • Meta-analysis confirmed a robust effect of expectation on CCE.

Conclusions:

  • Multisensory integration benefits from the expectation of sensory input.
  • Expectation plays a significant role in how the brain processes and integrates information from different senses.