Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

489
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
489
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

449
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
449
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.2K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

325
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
325
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

288
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
288

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Qingdao Port Cardiovascular Health Study: a prospective cohort study.

BMJ open·2015
Same author

Association of Patient-Reported Health Status With Long-Term Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions·2015
Same author

Screening Health Questionnaires and Patient-Reported Outcomes: Will Shortened Versions Overcome the Barriers to Their Implementation.

Journal of cardiac failure·2015
Same author

Variation of Quality of Life Data Collection Across INTERMACS Sites.

Journal of cardiac failure·2015
Same author

Effect of PCI on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

The New England journal of medicine·2015
Same author

Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

JAMA·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

A general framework for constraint approaches to adjusted risk differences.

Yuanyuan Tang1, Michelle Xia2, Liangrui Sun3

  • 1Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|November 8, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical framework to accurately estimate adjusted risk differences using binomial and Poisson regression models. The methods ensure valid probability estimates, overcoming common convergence issues in epidemiological research.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferencebootstrappingconstraint optimizationmaximum likelihood estimationrisk difference

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Risk difference is an interpretable measure for disease incidence comparison.
  • Standard regression models face convergence issues and invalid probability estimates (outside 0-1 range).
  • Adjusted risk differences are crucial for confounding control in epidemiological and clinical studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general framework for estimating adjusted risk differences using constrained binomial and Poisson regression models.
  • To address the limitations of standard models, ensuring valid probability estimates and preventing convergence issues.
  • To offer a robust method for risk difference estimation applicable across various inferential approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a general framework incorporating constraint approaches for binomial and Poisson regression.
  • Application of methods spanning ordinary least squares, maximum likelihood estimation, and Bayesian inference.
  • Validation through extensive simulation studies to assess performance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods successfully prevent estimated probabilities and confidence intervals from falling outside the valid (0,1) range.
  • Performance in terms of bias, variability, and coverage rates is comparable to existing alternatives.
  • Demonstrated effectiveness in solving convergence and estimation range issues.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed constrained regression framework provides a reliable method for estimating adjusted risk differences.
  • These methods enhance the utility of risk difference in epidemiological and clinical research by ensuring valid and stable estimates.
  • The approach is validated through simulations and an application to the PREMIER study data.