Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

08:45
Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption
Published on: June 20, 2025
607
Using GPS, accelerometry and heart rate to predict outdoor graded walking energy expenditure
P-Y de Müllenheim1, S Chaudru2, M Emily3
1Movement, Sport and Health Laboratory (EA 1274), Faculty of Sport Sciences, Université de Rennes 2, France.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
|November 8, 2017
Summary
Global Positioning System (GPS) is the most accurate method for estimating energy expenditure (EE) during outdoor walking, outperforming accelerometry and heart rate (HR) monitors, especially on graded terrain.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Wearable Technology
Background:
- Accurate estimation of energy expenditure (EE) is crucial for health and performance monitoring.
- Outdoor walking, a common physical activity, presents unique challenges for EE measurement due to variable terrain and speed.
- Existing methods like accelerometry and heart rate monitors have limitations in accuracy during diverse walking conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of Global Positioning System (GPS), accelerometry, and heart rate (HR) monitoring for estimating EE during outdoor walking.
- To identify the optimal method or combination of methods for various walking conditions, including level, uphill, and downhill.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for selecting the most effective technology for EE assessment in real-world walking scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Thirty adults participated in outdoor walking trials at different speeds (2.0, 3.5, 5.0 km/h) on level, 3.4% uphill, and 10.4% downhill gradients.
- Energy expenditure (EE) was measured using a portable metabolic system (K4b²).
- Participants simultaneously wore GPS, accelerometer, and HR monitor devices to collect data for analysis using linear mixed models (LMMs).
Main Results:
- Global Positioning System (GPS) demonstrated the highest accuracy in estimating EE across level, uphill, and downhill walking conditions.
- GPS accuracy was comparable to accelerometry during level walking but superior on graded inclines.
- Combining different methods did not significantly improve the accuracy of EE estimation beyond using GPS alone.
Conclusions:
- Global Positioning System (GPS) is the most accurate and reliable method for estimating energy expenditure during outdoor walking, particularly on varied terrain.
- The findings support the use of GPS technology for objective and precise EE assessment in free-living walking environments.
- This study offers valuable insights for selecting appropriate wearable technologies and equations for accurate EE monitoring in diverse outdoor walking activities.

