Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Muscadine Grape Skin Extract (MPX) in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter,
Channing J Paller1, Xian C Zhou2, Elisabeth I Heath3
1The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. cpaller1@jhmi.edu.
Abstract:
Purpose: MuscadinePlus (MPX), a commercial preparation of pulverized muscadine grape skin, was evaluated as a therapeutic option for men with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer wishing to defer androgen deprivation therapy.Experimental Design: This was a 12-month, multicenter, placebo-controlled, two-dose, double-blinded trial of MPX in 125 men with BCR prostate cancer, powered to detect a PSA doubling time (PSADT) difference of 6 months (low dose) and 12 months (high dose) relative to placebo. Participants were stratified (baseline PSADT, Gleason score) and randomly assigned 1:2:2 to receive placebo, 500 mg MPX (low), or 4,000 mg MPX (high) daily. Correlates included superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) genotype, lipid peroxidation, and polyphenol pharmacokinetics.Results: The evaluable population included 112 patients, all treated for at least 6 months and 62% treated for 12 months. No significant difference was found in PSADT change between control and treatment arms (P = 0.81): control 0.9 months (n = 20; range, 6.7-83.1), low dose 1.5 months (n = 52; range, 10.3-87.2), high dose 0.9 months (n = 40; range, 27.3-88.1). One high-dose patient experienced objective response. No drug-related CTCAE grade 3-4 adverse events were seen. In a preplanned exploratory analysis, PSADT pre-to-post increase was significant in the 27 (26%) genotyped patients with SOD2 Alanine/Alanine genotype (rs4880 T>C polymorphism) on MPX (pooled treatment arms; 6.4 months, P = 0.02), but not in control (1.8 months, P = 0.25).Conclusions: Compared with placebo, MPX did not significantly prolong PSADT in BCR patients over two different doses. Exploratory analysis revealed a patient population with potential benefit that would require further study. Clin Cancer Res; 24(2); 306-15. ©2017 AACR.
Insights
MuscadinePlus (MPX) did not significantly slow PSA doubling time in men with recurrent prostate cancer. However, an exploratory analysis suggested potential benefit in a specific SOD2 genotype subgroup.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Genetics
Background:
- Biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer necessitates treatment options to defer androgen deprivation therapy.
- MuscadinePlus (MPX), a muscadine grape skin preparation, was investigated for its potential therapeutic effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate MPX as a treatment for men with BCR prostate cancer.
- To determine if MPX can delay the need for androgen deprivation therapy by affecting prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT).
Main Methods:
- A 12-month, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involving 125 men with BCR prostate cancer.
- Participants received placebo, low-dose (500 mg), or high-dose (4,000 mg) MPX daily.
- Stratification by baseline PSADT and Gleason score; analysis included SOD2 genotype and lipid peroxidation.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in PSADT change was observed between MPX treatment arms and placebo.
- An exploratory analysis indicated a significant PSADT increase in patients with the SOD2 Alanine/Alanine genotype receiving MPX.
- No drug-related severe adverse events were reported.
Conclusions:
- MPX did not demonstrate a significant effect on PSADT in the overall study population.
- Further research is warranted to investigate the potential benefit of MPX in patients with the specific SOD2 genotype.
More Related Videos
09:49Isolation of Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: December 28, 2021
08:38Renal Capsule Xenografting and Subcutaneous Pellet Implantation for the Evaluation of Prostate Carcinogenesis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Published on: August 28, 2013