Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Content Analysis by the Crowd: Assessing the Usability of Crowdsourcing for Coding Latent Constructs
Fabienne Lind1, Maria Gruber1, Hajo G Boomgaarden1
1Department of Communications, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Crowdcoding offers a reliable and valid method for analyzing news texts, even for subtle political actor evaluations. This crowdsourcing approach provides a robust alternative to traditional manual content analysis for quantitative data collection.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Informatics
- Humanities
Background:
- Crowdsourcing is widely used in research for data annotation.
- Its application for analyzing less manifest content, like political evaluations in news, requires systematic assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate crowdcoding's reliability and validity for analyzing subtle news content.
- To investigate factors influencing data quality in crowdcoded political actor evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Two empirical studies were conducted.
- Study 1: Compared crowdcoded data with manual content analysis.
- Study 2: Examined effects of material presentation, instructions, and answer formats on data quality.
Main Results:
- Crowdcoded data demonstrated reliability and validity comparable to manual content analysis.
- Minor changes in coding instructions or presentation did not significantly impact data quality.
- Scale manipulations, however, did affect the results.
Conclusions:
- Crowdcoding is a robust and viable instrument for collecting quantitative content data, even for nuanced analyses.
- It serves as a reliable and valid alternative to manual coding methods.
Related Concept Videos
Attribution Theory
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Reliability and Validity
Quantifying Work
