Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exercise-induced hypoalgesia in healthy males is best explained by mechanisms selectively affecting deep-tissue pain sensitivity within exercising body parts.

Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Category-selective neural decreases in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex as defined with intracranial recordings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Horizontal image compression significantly impairs human face identity recognition.

Brain research·2026
Same author

In silico prediction of novel effective combinational treatment of chronic pain in individual patients: A joint white paper of the H2020 QSPainRelief consortium.

British journal of pharmacology·2026
Same author

The critical role of the right anterior fusiform gyrus in unfamiliar face identity discrimination.

Brain structure & function·2026
Same author

Objective neural face recognition neuromodulation within a single transcranial direct current stimulation session.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

26.6K

EEG Frequency-Tagging and Input-Output Comparison in Rhythm Perception.

Sylvie Nozaradan1,2,3,4, Peter E Keller5, Bruno Rossion6,7

  • 1The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development (WSU), Sydney, NSW, Australia. sylvie.nozaradan@uclouvain.be.

Brain Topography
|November 12, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Electroencephalography (EEG) frequency-tagging objectively measures how the brain processes musical rhythm. This method is valid for understanding rhythm perception despite acoustic complexities.

Keywords:
Auditory systemEEGFrequency-taggingNeural transformPerceptual categorizationRhythm and beat perception

More Related Videos

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

13.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis
08:22

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

Published on: April 26, 2024

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

26.6K
Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

13.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis
08:22

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

Published on: April 26, 2024

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Musical rhythm perception is a fundamental human behavior.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) frequency-tagging offers objective measurement of neural responses to auditory stimuli.
  • Concerns exist regarding the direct mapping of rhythmic input envelopes to neural output in frequency-domain analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address recent doubts about the validity of EEG frequency-tagging for studying auditory rhythm perception.
  • To argue that acoustic features and the many-to-one input-output relationship strengthen, rather than weaken, the approach.
  • To reaffirm the value of EEG frequency-tagging for understanding the neural basis of rhythm perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing frequency-tagging with electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze neural responses to auditory rhythmic stimuli.
  • Comparing frequency-domain representations of rhythmic input and EEG output.
  • Investigating the influence of acoustic features on the sound envelope and neural processing.

Main Results:

  • Acoustic features influencing the sound envelope's frequency spectrum support the interpretation of neural responses.
  • The many-to-one relationship between rhythmic input and perceived beat validates objective input-output transform measurement.
  • EEG frequency-tagging is confirmed as a valuable tool for studying rhythm perception when potential pitfalls are avoided.

Conclusions:

  • EEG frequency-tagging is a robust method for investigating the neural mechanisms of musical rhythm perception.
  • The approach's sensitivity to acoustic details and perceptual categorization is a strength, not a limitation.
  • Further research using EEG frequency-tagging can elucidate the complexities of rhythm processing in the brain.