Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

09:09
Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
8.1K
Why did the pheasant cross the road? Long-term road mortality patterns in relation to management changes
Joah R Madden1, Sarah E Perkins2
1Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK.
Royal Society Open Science
|November 15, 2017
Summary
Roadkill of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in the UK has not increased, but the timing has shifted. Dispersal from release pens and cessation of feeding now drive pheasant roadkill, not breeding season vulnerability.
Area of Science:
- Wildlife ecology
- Road ecology
- Conservation biology
Background:
- Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) roadkill is a significant issue in the UK, impacting both public safety and the game shooting industry.
- The rise in artificial pheasant rearing and release may influence population dynamics and movement behaviors, potentially affecting roadkill incidents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare pheasant roadkill patterns in the UK between the 1960s (pre-mass release) and 2010s (post-mass release).
- To investigate changes in the timing, sex distribution, and location of pheasant roadkill in relation to artificial rearing practices and traffic levels.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of intra-annual roadkill data for pheasants in the UK from the 1960s and 2010s.
- Comparison of roadkill patterns, considering sex, location, and temporal distribution, while accounting for traffic volume changes.
Main Results:
- The overall likelihood of pheasants being reported as roadkill has remained consistent over 50 years.
- A significant shift in the timing of roadkill was observed: breeding season peaks in the 1960s were replaced by peaks in September-November (dispersal) and a secondary peak in February (post-feeding) in the 2010s.
- Roadkill rates are higher in areas with scarce natural food resources, suggesting a link to supplementary feeding and habitat.
Conclusions:
- Artificial rearing and release programs have altered pheasant movement and survival patterns, leading to a shift in roadkill timing rather than an increase in overall incidence.
- Understanding these temporal patterns is crucial for implementing targeted mitigation strategies to reduce pheasant-wildlife vehicle collisions.

