Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography
Published on: June 21, 2024
Ultrasound features of secondary appendicitis in pediatric patients
Lyo Min Kwon1, Kwanseop Lee1, Soo Kee Min2
1Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Insights
Secondary appendicitis (SA) shows a smaller appendix diameter and less fat inflammation than primary appendicitis (PA) on ultrasound. However, SA exhibits similar mural hyperemia, aiding differential diagnosis in pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Pediatric Imaging
- Gastrointestinal Imaging
Background:
- Secondary appendicitis (SA) is a less common cause of appendiceal inflammation.
- Distinguishing SA from primary appendicitis (PA) is crucial for appropriate management.
- Ultrasonography is a key imaging modality for evaluating appendicitis in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ultrasonographic findings characteristic of secondary appendicitis (SA).
- To compare these findings with those of primary appendicitis (PA) to aid differential diagnosis.
- To identify key ultrasonographic features that differentiate SA from PA in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of ultrasonographic findings in 94 pediatric patients with SA and comparison with 99 patients with PA and 44 controls.
- Inclusion criteria for SA: bowel inflammation, inflamed appendix >6 mm diameter, improved with non-surgical treatment.
- Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher exact tests.
Main Results:
- Secondary appendicitis (SA) cases had a significantly smaller appendix diameter (mean 6.6 mm) compared to primary appendicitis (PA) (mean 9.8 mm).
- Periappendiceal fat inflammation (6% vs. 98%) and appendicoliths (11% vs. 34%) were significantly less frequent in SA than PA.
- Mural hyperemia on color Doppler ultrasonography was observed with similar frequency in both SA and PA (P=0.887).
Conclusions:
- Ultrasonographic features of SA include an increased appendix diameter, often in the equivocal range (mean 6.6 mm), and rare periappendiceal fat inflammation.
- Similar mural hyperemia in SA and PA suggests this finding is not a reliable differentiator.
- These ultrasonographic characteristics can help differentiate SA from PA, guiding clinical management.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultrasonographic findings of secondary appendicitis (SA) and to discuss the differential findings compared with primary appendicitis.
Methods:
In this study, we analyzed the ultrasonographic findings of 94 patients under 15 years old of age treated at our institution from May 2005 to May 2014 who had bowel inflammation and an inflamed appendix with a maximal outer diameter >6 mm that improved with nonsurgical treatment (the SA group). Ninety-nine patients with pathologically proven acute appendicitis (the primary appendicitis [PA] group) from June 2013 to May 2014 and 44 patients with pathologically negative appendectomy results from May 2005 to May 2014 were also included to compare the ultrasonographic features of these conditions. A retrospective review of the ultrasonographic findings was performed by two radiologists. The clinical and laboratory findings were also reviewed. The results were statically analyzed using analysis of variance, the Pearson chi-square test, and the two-tailed Fisher exact test.
Results:
Compared with PA, cases of SA had a smaller diameter (9.8 mm vs. 6.6 mm, P<0.001), and were less likely to show periappendiceal fat inflammation (98% vs. 6%, P<0.001) or an appendicolith (34% vs. 11%, P<0.001). SA showed mural hyperemia on color Doppler ultrasonography as frequently as PA (P=0.887).
Conclusion:
The ultrasonographic features of SA included an increased diameter compared to a healthy appendix and the same level of hyperemia as in PA. However, the diameter was commonly in the equivocal range (mean diameter, 6.6 mm), and periappendiceal fat inflammation was rarely present in SA.
More Related Videos
05:50Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...