Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
[Relationship between the severity of reflux esophagitis and the esophageal motility features on high resolution
1Department of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Rocket Force General Hospital PLA, Beijing 100088, China.
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze esophageal motility dysfunction in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with different severity of esophagitis, and the relationship between the esophageal motility dysfunction and the severity of esophagitis. Methods: GERD patients simultaneously undergone endoscopy and high-resolution manometry were divided into four groups: Non-esophagitis (Non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, NERD) group, mild esophagitis group, moderate esophagitis group and severe esophagitis group. The gender and age were matched for each group, and every group consisted of 80 cases. Nonparametric test was used to analyze the differences in HRM parameters, such as upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, LES length, LES-CD (crural diaphragm) separation distance, and the percentage of failed peristalsis of the four groups, and the differences between each two of the groups were also analyzed. Results: Nonparametric test showed that the LES pressure and length decreased with the severity of esophagitis, and there were statistical differences (P<0.001, P=0.030). The failed peristalsis percentage increased with the severity of esophagitis and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The LES-CD separation distance was increased with the severity of esophagitis and had statistically significance (P<0.001). When comparing the differences between each two of the groups, there were significant differences (P<0.001, P=0.012, P<0.001, P<0.001) between NERD group and severe esophagitis group in the HRM parameters of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, the LES length, the LES-CD separation distance, and the percentage of ineffective swallowing in the NERD and severe esophagitis group. The detection rate of HH was significantly increased from NERD to severe esophagitis, the detection rate of HH was 6.3% to 82.5% in gastoracopy and 16.3% to 45.0% in HRM, and the diagnostic consistency was fair (Kappa Value: 0.31). Conclusions: Hypo-dynamic state of esophageal and HH are the main motility characteristics of erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, Esophageal motility abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of GERD from NERD to severe esophagitis, these motility disorders may also play important roles in causing esophagitis.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Gastric Motility
Peristaltic Waves and Chyme Formation
Upon food entry, the stomach initiates...

