Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Preparation and Gene Modification of Nonhuman Primate Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
Published on: February 15, 2019
Rethinking Human-Nonhuman Primate Contact and Pathogenic Disease Spillover
Victor Narat1, Lys Alcayna-Stevens1, Stephanie Rupp2
1Emerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724, Paris Cedex, France.
Human-animal contact drives zoonotic disease risk, but the term "contact" is used inconsistently. More precise definitions and consideration of ecological, social, and historical factors are needed for understanding pathogen transmission.
Area of Science:
- Zoonotic disease research
- One Health
- Anthropology
Background:
- Zoonotic transmissions pose significant global health risks, with human-animal contact often cited as a primary driver.
- Existing literature frequently links increased human-animal contact to higher risks of disease spillover.
- The term "contact" itself lacks rigorous analysis and consistent definition in studies of zooanthroponosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically analyze the term "contact" in the context of human-nonhuman primate (NHP) engagements and pathogen transmission.
- To explore how spatial overlap between human and NHP habitats influences disease transmission dynamics.
- To integrate anthropological perspectives on historical, social, and environmental processes shaping zoonotic spillovers.
Main Methods:
- Multi-disciplinary literature review of studies on human-NHP interactions and pathogen transmission, focusing on the use of the term "contact".
- Examination of research on spatial overlap between human and NHP habitats as a factor in disease transmission.
- Integration of anthropological approaches to understand broader contextual factors influencing zoonotic spillovers.
Main Results:
- The term "contact" is inconsistently and imprecisely applied across studies, often overlooking pathogen diversity and transmission routes.
- Spatial overlap of habitats is considered but does not fully explain the mechanisms bringing together hosts, pathogens, and humans.
- Anthropological and historical analyses offer a more comprehensive understanding of the processes underlying zoonotic spillover events.
Conclusions:
- Researchers must precisely define "human-animal contact" when investigating zoonotic diseases.
- Broader ecological, social, and historical contexts are crucial for understanding pathogen transmission dynamics between humans and animals.
- An integrated approach, combining contact analysis, spatial considerations, and socio-historical factors, is essential for predicting and mitigating zoonotic risks.
More Related Videos
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
10:26Author Spotlight: A Cost-Effective Genomic Workflow for Advancing Rabies Control in Resource-Limited Settings
Published on: August 18, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Viral Recombination
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Causality in Epidemiology
Cross-reactivity