Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.6K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.3K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.3K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.6K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Barriers and enablers to the implementation of osteoarthritis management programmes in primary or community care settings: A systematic review and qualitative framework synthesis.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2026
Same author

Exploration of the van der Waals Region of the NO <i>A</i><sup>2</sup>Σ<sup>+</sup> + N<sub>2</sub> <i>X</i><sup>1</sup>Σ<sub><i>g</i></sub><sup>+</sup> Collision Complex.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same author

Low-Dose Naltrexone in the Perioperative Setting: An Emerging Clinical Challenge.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
Same author

Bidirectional opioid conversion between intrathecal morphine and methadone: advancing clinical practice frameworks.

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2026
Same author

GWAS and genomic prediction of crown rust resistance in the southern US elite oat (Avena sativa L.) germplasm.

The plant genome·2026
Same author

In Situ Lipid Interactions of an Anticancer Metal Complex.

Inorganic chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.5K

Development of spin-orbit coupling for stochastic configuration interaction techniques.

Paul Murphy1, Jeremy P Coe1, Martin J Paterson1

  • 1Institute of Chemical Sciences, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.

Journal of Computational Chemistry
|November 20, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Monte Carlo Configuration Interaction (MCCI) software enables accurate spin-orbit coupling calculations for atoms and molecules. This method efficiently generates compact wavefunctions, crucial for predicting energy level splitting and molecular interactions.

Keywords:
Breit-Pauli HamiltonianMonte Carlo Configuration InteractionO2 moleculespin-orbit couplingstochastic

More Related Videos

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.7K
All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.5K
Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.7K
All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
11:33

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics

Published on: January 19, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum chemistry
  • Atomic and molecular physics
  • Computational chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate zeroth-order wavefunctions are essential for spin-orbit coupling (SOC) calculations.
  • Stochastic methods offer a promising avenue for constructing complex wavefunctions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Develop and validate the Monte Carlo Configuration Interaction (MCCI) method for SOC calculations.
  • Assess MCCI's efficacy in predicting energy level splitting in atoms and small molecules.
  • Lay the groundwork for MCCI applications in larger, multireference systems.

Main Methods:

  • Iterative construction of multireference wavefunctions using a stochastic Monte Carlo Configuration Interaction (MCCI) approach.
  • Incorporation of spin-orbit coupling effects via first-order degenerate perturbation theory with the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian.
  • Application to atoms (B, C, O, F, Si, S, Cl) and diatomic radicals (OH, CN, NO, C2).

Main Results:

  • MCCI yields highly accurate results with compact wavefunctions, outperforming other methods.
  • Calculated spin-orbit coupling constants and energy level splittings for various atomic and molecular species.
  • Demonstrated convergence of MCCI to full configuration interaction (FCI) for stretched OH.
  • Investigated singlet-triplet interactions in O2.

Conclusions:

  • The MCCI method is a powerful and efficient tool for calculating spin-orbit coupling.
  • MCCI provides accurate predictions of energy level splittings and interactions, even with compact wavefunctions.
  • This work establishes MCCI as a viable method for future studies of complex electronic structures and relativistic effects.