Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Mechanical Circulatory Support for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Mahir Elder1, Nimrod Blank1, Adi Shemesh1
1Department of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4160 John R Street, Suite 510, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices aid high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism and cardiogenic shock. Device choice depends on institutional expertise and specific device traits, not solely on pulmonary artery pulsatility index.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Medical Devices
Background:
- High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) with cardiogenic shock necessitates advanced treatment.
- Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are critical in managing such complex cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role and selection criteria for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with pulmonary embolism and cardiogenic shock.
- To discuss the efficacy of current MCS devices and reassess the utility of the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PI) for right ventricular assessment.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical practices regarding temporary MCS for PE-induced cardiogenic shock.
- Analysis of device-specific features and performance metrics, including circulatory support capacity and impact on hemodynamic parameters.
Main Results:
- Temporary MCS devices effectively reduce right atrial pressure and provide circulatory support (4-5 L/min).
- Device selection is influenced by center experience and device characteristics.
- The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PI) may be an unreliable indicator of right ventricular function in this context.
Conclusions:
- Temporary MCS is a viable option for select high-risk PE patients with cardiogenic shock.
- Individualized clinical assessment is paramount for determining the need for MCS.
- Reliance on pulmonary artery pulsatility index alone for guiding therapy is not recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

