Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A SIMPLE substudy
Mate Vamos1, Jeff S Healey2, Jia Wang3
1University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Insights
Defibrillation testing (DT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion showed no significant difference in outcomes compared to other cardiomyopathies. DT did not improve shock efficacy in HCM patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients face higher risks for defibrillation issues and complications with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
- Assessing the necessity and impact of defibrillation testing (DT) in these high-risk patients is crucial for optimizing ICD therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the value of defibrillation testing (DT) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation.
- To compare DT efficacy, perioperative complications, and long-term outcomes in HCM patients versus those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
Main Methods:
- The study analyzed data from the SIMPLE trial, comparing HCM patients with ICM/DCM patients who underwent ICD insertion.
- Outcomes including defibrillation thresholds, perioperative complications, and long-term mortality were assessed.
- HCM patients were further analyzed based on randomization to DT or no DT groups.
Main Results:
- Defibrillation safety margins were similar between HCM (88.5%) and ICM/DCM (90.5%) patients.
- Perioperative complications were comparable across HCM with DT (1.9%), ICM/DCM with DT (6.4%), and HCM without DT (7.1%).
- Long-term outcomes such as all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events, and shock complications did not significantly differ between HCM and ICM/DCM groups, nor between HCM patients with or without DT.
Conclusions:
- Defibrillation testing (DT) did not demonstrate a significant benefit in improving intraoperative or clinical shock efficacy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients.
- No significant differences were observed in intraoperative defibrillation efficacy, perioperative complications, or long-term outcomes between HCM and other cardiomyopathy groups (ICM/DCM).
Background:
Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are considered to be at high risk for elevated defibrillation thresholds, periprocedural complications, and failed appropriate shocks.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to determine the value of defibrillation testing (DT) in HCM patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion.
Methods:
Defibrillation thresholds, perioperative complications, and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with HCM and those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) enrolled in the SIMPLE (Shockless IMPLant Evaluation) trial (Clinialtrials.gov Identifier: NCT00800384). In patients with HCM, outcomes were also compared between those randomized to DT vs no DT.
Results:
Adequate defibrillation safety margin without system change was achieved in 46 of 52 (88.5%) HCM and 948 of 1047 (90.5%) ICM/DCM patients (P = .63). Perioperative complications occurred in 1 of 52 (1.9%) HCM patients with DT compared to 67 of 1047 (6.4%) ICM/DCM patients with DT (P = .37) or 3 of 42 (7.1%) HCM patients without DT (P = .32). During follow-up, there was no significant difference between HCM vs ICM/DCM patients in terms of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-2.34), composite of arrhythmic death or failed appropriate shock (adjusted HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04-2.42), inappropriate shocks (adjusted HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.69-3.89), or system complications (adjusted HR 1.93, 95% CI 0.88-4.27). All-cause mortality (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.03-2.20), appropriate (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03-2.05), and inappropriate shocks (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.51-8.94) were similar in HCM patients without or those with DT.
Conclusion:
We did not find any difference in intraoperative defibrillation efficacy, perioperative complications, and long-term outcomes between patients with HCM and those with ICM/DCM. DT did not improve intraoperative or clinical shock efficacy in HCM patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy


