Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Cortisol Measurement in Koala Phascolarctos cinereus Fur
Published on: August 23, 2019
Dynamics in the global protected-area estate since 2004.
Edward Lewis1, Brian MacSharry1, Diego Juffe-Bignoli1
1UN Environment - World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL, U.K.
Protected areas show dynamic changes, with significant areas added and removed annually. Meeting conservation targets requires reducing removals or increasing designations in the World Database on Protected Areas.
Area of Science:
- Conservation Science
- Environmental Management
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Background:
- Protected areas are crucial for global environmental goals and conservation efforts.
- The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) tracks progress but its current method oversimplifies changes over time.
- Previous assessments using the latest WDPA data do not capture the dynamic nature of protected area designations and removals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the dynamic changes in protected areas over time using historical WDPA data.
- To quantify the annual areas added to and removed from the WDPA from 2004 to 2016.
- To provide a more nuanced understanding beyond simple narratives of protected area growth or decline.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tools for spatial analysis.
- Analyzed 12 temporally distinct versions of the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) from 2004 to 2016.
- Quantified annual additions and removals of protected areas within the WDPA.
Main Results:
- On average, 2.5 million km² were added and 1.1 million km² were removed from the WDPA annually between 2004 and 2016.
- Protected area growth was predominantly in the marine realm, and some removed areas were later re-protected.
- Reasons for WDPA inclusion/removal included data quality issues and actual on-the-ground changes.
Conclusions:
- The narrative of continuous protected area growth is an oversimplification, as is the narrative of removal.
- Achieving Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 (17% protected areas by 2020) requires addressing both the rate of protected area removal and designation.
- Future conservation strategies must account for the dynamic nature of protected areas to meet global targets.
More Related Videos
08:09Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
Published on: September 12, 2017
09:19Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Declining Populations
Threats to Biodiversity
Zones of Protection
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...
Conservation of Small Populations
Habitat Fragmentation
Population Growth