Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Translating Computer-Aided Design and Surgical Planning Into Successful Mandibular Reconstruction Using a
Lei Zheng1, Xiaoming Lv2, Jie Zhang3
1Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Purpose:
This study evaluated the computer-aided approach to the reconstruction of mandibular defects using a vascularized iliac-crest flap.
Materials And Methods:
From December 2015 to October 2016, 14 patients (8 men and 6 women) 18 to 64 years old (median age, 29 yr) were treated at the Peking University School and Stomatology Hospital (Beijing, China). Biopsy specimens from all patients were subjected to histologic examination before segmental mandibulectomy. Computer-based surgical techniques, including virtual surgical planning, computer-aided design and manufacturing, rapid prototyping, and intraoperative navigation, were used to restore the anatomic continuity and configuration of the mandible using a vascularized iliac-crest flap. Two transverse dimensions and 1 anteroposterior (A-P) dimension were evaluated based on the virtual plan and postoperative computed tomogram. Lines from condylar head to condylar head and from gonial angle to gonial angle were defined as the transverse dimensions. A perpendicular line drawn from the mandibular midline to the center point on the condylar head to condylar head measurement was defined as the A-P dimension. Complications were evaluated during follow-up.
Results:
The flap success rate was 92.9% (13 of 14), with 1 flap failure. After the operation, there were no other serious complications in 13 of the 14 patients, who exhibited a good mandibular configuration with good occlusion. Furthermore, the height of bone graft was sufficient for implants. Healing of the recipient and donor sites with no serious complication was uneventful. The average surgical errors in the A-P dimension and transverse dimensions were 1.8 ± 1.0 mm (range, 0.2 to 3.7 mm), 2.2 ± 1.1 mm (range, 0.9 to 5.0 mm), and 2.6 ± 1.6 mm (range, 0.3 to 7.2 mm), respectively.
Conclusions:
The use of these digital techniques was found to be a viable option for reconstruction of mandibular defects, but the results should be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of patients and the relatively short follow-up.
