Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Discontinuation of Efavirenz in Paediatric Patients: Why do Children Switch?
Elke Wynberg1, Eleri Williams2,3, Gareth Tudor-Williams2,4
1The Family Clinic, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, UK. elke.wynberg@stcatz.ox.ac.uk.
Insights
Nearly two-thirds of children switched efavirenz treatment due to virological failure or side effects, with most adverse events affecting the central nervous system (CNS). Alternative regimens are recommended for pediatric HIV treatment.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric HIV/AIDS
- Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Efavirenz is a widely used first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV in children and adults.
- Central nervous system (CNS) adverse effects and treatment discontinuation are significant concerns with efavirenz in adults, but data in children are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the single-center pediatric experience with efavirenz-based ART.
- To analyze reasons for efavirenz discontinuation in children and adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-note audit of children and adolescents (≤18 years) receiving efavirenz.
- Data collected on treatment initiation, adverse events, virological failure, and regimen switches.
Main Results:
- 59% of 51 children switched from efavirenz, with 29% due to virological failure and 30% due to adverse effects.
- Central nervous system (CNS) adverse effects (sleep disturbance, mood changes, psychosis) were most common, reported by 19.6% of those experiencing side effects.
- Other adverse events included gynaecomastia, hypercholesterolaemia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome.
Conclusions:
- Almost two-thirds of the pediatric cohort switched from efavirenz, driven equally by virological failure and toxicity.
- CNS adverse effects were the predominant side effects observed.
- First-line ART regimens with better tolerability and higher genetic barriers to resistance are preferred for pediatric HIV management.
Background:
Efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) is used globally as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in combination with a dual nucleoside backbone in adults and children from 3 years of age. Up to 40% of adults taking efavirenz report central nervous system (CNS) adverse effects, and the rates of discontinuation of efavirenz-based treatment are higher than other first-line regimens. Data on efavirenz discontinuation are more limited for children and adolescents.
Objective:
In this study, we aimed to describe our single-centre paediatric experience of efavirenz.
Methods:
Retrospective case-note audit of children and adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV who ever received efavirenz.
Results:
From 1998 and 2014, 51 children and adolescents aged ≤ 18 years received efavirenz-based treatment. Median age at efavirenz initiation was 9.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7-13). More than half (30/51; 59%) subsequently switched off efavirenz-15 (29%) following virological failure with NNRTI-associated resistance mutations, and 16 (30%) after reporting adverse effects. Of those who experienced adverse effects, one-fifth (19.6%) described CNS adverse effects, including sleep disturbance, reduced concentration, headaches, mood change and psychosis. Four children (three males) developed gynaecomastia, two developed hypercholesterolaemia, and one child developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Comparison between those reporting side effects and the rest of the cohort showed no difference in age, sex, initial CD4 cell count, viral suppression, length of efavirenz-based treatment, weight, or efavirenz dose per kilogram. Median time to switch was 25 months (IQR 10-71) in those who experienced side effects and 22 months (IQR 12-50) for virological failure. One individual experienced both virological failure and adverse effects.
Conclusion:
Almost two-thirds of this paediatric cohort switched from efavirenz-based treatment to an alternative regimen, due in equal proportions to both virological failure and toxicity. The majority of side effects involved the CNS. First-line regimens with improved tolerability and a higher genetic barrier to resistance should be the preferred option for children.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview

