Time to continuous electroencephalogram in repeated admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit

Iván Sánchez Fernández1, Arnold J Sansevere2, Marina Gaínza-Lein3

  • 1Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Child Neurology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain.

Seizure
|November 29, 2017
PubMed

Insights

The time to continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring after intensive care unit (ICU) admission did not improve with repeated admissions, even for patients with seizures. This suggests no significant change in cEEG initiation timing across multiple ICU stays.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric critical care medicine
  • Neurophysiology
  • Clinical informatics

Background:

  • Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is crucial for detecting non-convulsive seizures and other neurological events in critically ill patients.
  • Repeated intensive care unit (ICU) admissions may offer opportunities to improve the timeliness of cEEG initiation.
  • Understanding the temporal relationship between ICU admission and cEEG initiation is essential for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the time interval from intensive care unit (ICU) admission to the initiation of continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring in pediatric patients with repeated ICU admissions.
  • To determine if this time interval changes significantly across subsequent ICU admissions.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective observational study was conducted on pediatric patients admitted to the ICU between 2011 and 2013 who required repeated cEEG monitoring.
  • The primary outcome measured was the duration from ICU admission to cEEG initiation.
  • Statistical analysis compared this time interval between the first and second ICU admissions, including subgroups with electrographic seizures or status epilepticus.

Main Results:

  • The study included 41 patients with at least two ICU admissions requiring cEEG.
  • The median time from ICU admission to cEEG initiation was not significantly different between the first and second ICU admissions (10.7 hours vs. 13 hours).
  • This lack of improvement in cEEG timing persisted even in patients who experienced seizures or status epilepticus during their initial ICU admission.

Conclusions:

  • The time from ICU admission to cEEG initiation does not appear to shorten with subsequent ICU admissions in pediatric patients.
  • Even in the presence of neurological emergencies like seizures or status epilepticus during the first admission, subsequent admissions did not show improved cEEG initiation timeliness.
  • Further research may be needed to identify barriers and implement strategies to expedite cEEG initiation in critically ill children with recurrent ICU admissions.
Abstract