Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
Ana Paula Susin Osório1, Alexandre Schaan de Quadros1, José Luiz da Costa Vieira1
1Instituto de Cardiologia/Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC/FUC), Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil.
Insights
Complete revascularization in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary artery disease improves cardiovascular outcomes. This review examines recent evidence to guide optimal treatment strategies for these high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presents treatment challenges.
- Current guidelines often do not recommend routine complete revascularization.
- Emerging evidence suggests potential benefits of complete revascularization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and objectively present the latest evidence on complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in STEMI with multivessel CAD.
- To inform evidence-based strategies for managing these complex cardiovascular cases.
- To clarify the role of complete revascularization in improving patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of recent randomized clinical trials.
- Analysis of studies comparing complete revascularization with culprit-lesion-only revascularization.
- Evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes, including mortality and major adverse cardiac events.
Main Results:
- Recent randomized trials indicate a significant reduction in cardiovascular outcomes with complete revascularization.
- Benefits observed include decreased rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization procedures.
- The findings challenge the traditional guideline-based approach for specific patient subgroups.
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel CAD may offer superior outcomes compared to culprit-lesion-only PCI.
- Further research and guideline updates are warranted to refine treatment strategies.
- Personalized approaches considering patient-specific factors are crucial for optimal management.
Abstract:
The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine complete revascularization in these patients, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of this approach in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. For this reason, an adequate review of this evidence is essential in order to establish scientifically based strategy and achieve better outcomes for these patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. This review aims to present objectively the most recent evidence available on this topic.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
08:12Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations