Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Is Augmentation Required to Correct Malar Deficiency With Maxillary Advancement?
Chad Petersen1, Michael R Markiewicz2, Michael Miloro3
1Chief Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL.
Maxillary advancement alone often improves malar projection, benefiting patients with maxillary hypoplasia. Simultaneous malar augmentation may be considered based on individual patient desires for enhanced malar eminence projection.
Area of Science:
- Craniofacial surgery
- Orthognathic surgery
- Aesthetic surgery
Background:
- Maxillary hypoplasia frequently coexists with malar deficiency.
- Le Fort I advancement is a common procedure for maxillary hypoplasia.
- Malar augmentation can be considered concurrently with maxillary advancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare pre- and postoperative facial profiles of patients undergoing Le Fort I advancement.
- To evaluate the subjective perception of malar eminence projection changes.
- To assess the impact of simultaneous malar augmentation versus maxillary advancement alone.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing Le Fort I advancement with and without malar augmentation.
- Pre- and postoperative photographs assessed by laypersons and professionals.
- Visual analog scale used for malar region assessment.
- Statistical analysis including Wilcoxon signed rank test and t tests.
Main Results:
- Both groups perceived an increase in malar eminence projection postoperatively.
- Laypersons and professionals noted improved projection in both malarplasty and non-malar cohorts.
- Laypersons overestimated malar augmentation procedures; professionals demonstrated higher specificity in exclusion.
Conclusions:
- Le Fort I advancement typically leads to subjective improvement in malar projection for patients with maxillary hypoplasia.
- Maxillary advancement alone may suffice for optimal aesthetic outcomes.
- The decision for concurrent malar augmentation should align with patient preferences.
More Related Videos
07:16Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021