Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Gun attitudes on campus: United and divided by safety needs
James A Shepperd1, Gabrielle Pogge1, Joy E Losee1
1a University of Florida.
Abstract:
All people share a need for safety. Yet people's pursuit of safety can conflict when it comes to guns, with some people perceiving guns as a means to safety and others perceiving guns as a threat to safety. We examined this conflict on a U.S. college campus that prohibits guns. We distinguished between people (N = 11,390) who (1) own a gun for protection, (2) own a gun exclusively for reasons other than protection (e.g., collecting, sports), and (3) do not own a gun. Protection owners felt less safe on campus and supported allowing guns on campus. They also reported that they and others would feel safer and that gun violence would decrease if they carried a gun on campus. Non-owners and non-protection owners felt the reverse. The findings suggest that protection concerns, rather than gun-ownership per se, account for diverging perceptions and attitudes about guns and gun control.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Aggression
Attitudes
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Obedience
Bystander Effect

