Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026
![Studying Metabolic Brain Connectivity Using 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography at the Single-subject Level](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F67458.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Studying Metabolic Brain Connectivity Using 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography at the Single-subject Level
Published on: January 24, 2025
Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies.
Sandeep S V Golla1, Sofie M Adriaanse2, Maqsood Yaqub2
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.golla@vumc.nl.
Five model selection criteria for brain PET kinetic modeling showed strong agreement. Minor differences did not impact overall model selection, confirming consistency in identifying optimal tracer kinetic models.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear medicine
- Radiochemistry
- Pharmacokinetics
Background:
- Optimal kinetic modeling is crucial for quantitative analysis in brain PET studies.
- Several criteria exist to select the best kinetic model, but their agreement is not fully established.
- This study compares five common model selection criteria: AIC, AICC, MSC, SC, and F-test.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the consistency of kinetic model preference identification using five different model selection criteria.
- To determine if discrepancies among criteria affect the final model choice in brain PET studies.
Main Methods:
- Six tracers ([11C]FMZ, [11C]GMOM, [11C]PK11195, [11C]Raclopride, [18F]FDG, [11C]PHT) were analyzed.
- Time-activity curves (TACs) were modeled using six plasma input models (1T2k, 2T3k, 2T4k, with and without VB).
- Model preference percentages were calculated for each tracer and criterion, with F-test as the reference.
Main Results:
- All five model selection criteria demonstrated strong agreement in identifying preferred kinetic models across tracers.
- The F-test confirmed AIC-preferred models in 87% of cases.
- Minimal disagreement was observed between AIC and AICC, with consistent model selection across all criteria except for one subject.
Conclusions:
- The evaluated model selection criteria (AIC, AICC, MSC, SC, F-test) yield largely consistent results for brain PET kinetic modeling.
- Minor differences among criteria do not significantly alter the overall selection of the optimal kinetic model.
- This suggests robustness in quantitative analysis regardless of the specific criterion used.
More Related Videos
09:36In vivo Positron Emission Tomography to Reveal Activity Patterns Induced by Deep Brain Stimulation in Rats
Published on: March 23, 2022
09:03Radiotracer Administration for High Temporal Resolution Positron Emission Tomography of the Human Brain: Application to FDG-fPET
Published on: October 22, 2019