Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

68.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
68.1K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

44.6K
Overview
44.6K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

69.6K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
69.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K
Constraints and Statical Determinacy01:26

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

1.0K
In structural engineering, the equilibrium of a system is not only determined by its equations of equilibrium but also with the help of constraints. Constraints refer to restrictions on the motion of a system. The proper combinations of constraints can minimize the total number of constraints needed to maintain a system in mechanical equilibrium. When this happens, the system is said to be statically determinate. For such systems, the unknown reaction supports can be estimated using equilibrium...
1.0K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

444
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
444

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a digital ecological momentary assessment tool for 'real time' evaluation in implementation science: testing through evaluation of a novel digital social prescribing intervention.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Protocol of ASPro-PD: a phase 3 trial of ambroxol to slow progression in genetically stratified Parkinson's disease.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

An Umbrella Review of Quality of Life Among the General Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Batch Synthesis of Primaquine Diphosphate Anti-Malarial Drug.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Synthesis of Prilocaine Hydrochloride in Continuous Flow Systems.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

COVID-19 transmission between the community and meat processing plants in Ireland: A retrospective modelling study.

Heliyon·2024
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K

Invariants in probabilistic reasoning.

Fintan Costello1, Paul Watts2

  • 1School of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Cognitive Psychology
|December 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People's probabilistic reasoning shows surprising mathematical rules, with biases canceling out to match normative probability theory. Two models, probability theory plus noise and quantum probability, are assessed for their explanatory power.

Keywords:
BiasesProbabilityRationality

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Mathematical psychology
  • Decision science

Background:

  • Human probabilistic reasoning often deviates from normative probability theory.
  • Despite systematic biases, specific mathematical identities (QQ, addition law, Bayes rule) are observed in judgments.
  • These identities align with normative probability theory, suggesting underlying mathematical regularities in biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mathematical rules governing systematic biases in human probabilistic reasoning.
  • To evaluate the explanatory capabilities of two competing models: 'probability theory plus noise' and 'quantum probability'.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of human judgments in probabilistic reasoning tasks.
  • Comparison of observed reasoning patterns against predictions from normative probability theory.
  • Assessment of two mathematical models for their ability to account for invariant identities and systematic biases.

Main Results:

  • Identified three invariant identities (QQ, addition law, Bayes rule) in probabilistic judgments.
  • Demonstrated that systematic biases can cancel out, leading to agreement with normative probability requirements.
  • Found that these patterns challenge simple 'probability theory plus noise' models.

Conclusions:

  • Human probabilistic reasoning exhibits structured biases that adhere to mathematical rules.
  • Quantum probability models offer a potential framework for understanding these structured biases and invariant identities.
  • The findings necessitate a re-evaluation of cognitive models of probabilistic judgment.