Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
A Comparison of Methods for Uncovering Sample Heterogeneity: Structural Equation Model Trees and Finite Mixture
Ross Jacobucci1, Kevin J Grimm2, John J McArdle1
1University of Southern California.
Abstract:
Although finite mixture models have received considerable attention, particularly in the social and behavioral sciences, an alternative method for creating homogeneous groups, structural equation model trees (Brandmaier, von Oertzen, McArdle, & Lindenberger, 2013), is a recent development that has received much less application and consideration. It is our aim to compare and contrast these methods for uncovering sample heterogeneity. We illustrate the use of these methods with longitudinal reading achievement data collected as part of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort. We present the use of structural equation model trees as an alternative framework that does not assume the classes are latent and uses observed covariates to derive their structure. We consider these methods as complementary and discuss their respective strengths and limitations for creating homogeneous groups.
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Test for Homogeneity
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

