Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

945
Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
945
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

9.0K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
9.0K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT01:28

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

395
Cardiac computed tomography (CT) scanning is an advanced cardiac imaging technique that utilizes CT technology, with or without intravenous (IV) contrast, to produce accurate cross-sectional virtual slices of specific areas of the heart, coronary circulation, and major blood vessels such as the aorta, pulmonary veins, and arteries. The computer processes these slices to generate three-dimensional images. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is a rapid form of CT scanning that captures multiple slices...
395

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-label Ensemble Model for Knee Joint Anatomy and Lesion Segmentation: Segmentation of Clinical Images With Ensembling, Morphology, and Attention (SCEMA).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

High-Resolution MR Imaging of Elbow Ligament Injuries and Associated Impingement and Instability Syndromes.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Highly Accelerated T<sub>1ρ</sub> Imaging in 3 min: Comparison Between Compressed Sensing and Deep Learning Reconstruction.

NMR in biomedicine·2026
Same author

Enhancing Study Design and Analysis of MR Imaging Markers Through Measurement Error Modeling.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same author

Scalable Clinical Annotation with Location Evidence (SCALE).

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Reply.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

10.4K

Dose Reduction With Dedicated CT Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm: CT Phantom Study.

Naveen Subhas1, Camilla P Pursyko1, Joshua M Polster1

  • 11 Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, A21, Cleveland, OH 44195.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|December 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Metal artifact reduction (MAR) significantly improves lesion detection accuracy near implants on CT scans compared to standard filtered back projection (FBP). This advanced technique allows for reduced radiation exposure without sacrificing diagnostic performance.

Keywords:
CTartifactdose reductionphantom

More Related Videos

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

14.9K
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

10.4K
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

14.9K
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Image Reconstruction

Background:

  • Metal artifacts from implants in CT scans can obscure lesions.
  • Standard filtered back projection (FBP) struggles with metal artifact reduction.
  • Advanced algorithms like metal artifact reduction (MAR) aim to improve image quality in the presence of metal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare reader accuracy in detecting lesions near simulated arthroplasty hardware using MAR versus FBP at varying radiation doses.
  • To assess if MAR can reduce radiation exposure without compromising lesion detectability.

Main Methods:

  • A CT phantom with simulated hardware and lesions was scanned at clinical, low, and high radiation doses.
  • Images were reconstructed using iterative MAR, advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE), and FBP.
  • Three radiologists independently reviewed anonymized images for lesion detection accuracy.

Main Results:

  • MAR demonstrated significantly higher accuracy and sensitivity than FBP across all radiation exposures.
  • Low-dose MAR was not inferior to standard- and high-dose FBP in accuracy.
  • MAR was particularly effective in detecting smaller lesions and those near streak artifacts.

Conclusions:

  • MAR enhances reader accuracy for detecting lesions adjacent to metallic implants.
  • MAR enables substantial radiation dose reduction compared to FBP while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.