Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth
1Care and Public Health Research Institute (Caphri), Department of Health, Ethics and Society (HES), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, NL-6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. b.penders@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Abstract:
Academic misconduct distorts the relationship between scientific practice and the knowledge it produces. The relationship between science and the knowledge it produces is, however, not something universally agreed upon. In this paper I will critically discuss the moral status of an act of research misconduct, namely plagiarism, in the context of different epistemological positions. While from a positivist view of science, plagiarism only influences trust in science but not the content of the scientific corpus, from a constructivist point of view both are at stake. Consequently, I argue that discussions of research misconduct and responsible research ought to be explicitly informed by the authors' views on the relationship between science and the knowledge it produces.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Understanding Deception
Social Traps
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Ethics in Research
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...

