Biomechanical study comparing Pulvertaft suture to step-cut suture

Tendon grafts are a component of the therapeutic arsenal for managing chronic flexor tendons injuries in the hand, especially during two-stage Hunter reconstruction. The purpose of this anatomical study was to compare the strength of the Pulvertaft weave versus the step-cut suture used for flexor tendon reconstruction to determine their role in early active mobilization. We performed a biomechanical study with cadaver specimens. Thirty-four hands were randomized and the tendons from both hands were equally assigned to each group. A comparison of the Pulvertaft weave (group 1) versus the step-cut suture (group 2) using the flexor digitorum profundus from the fourth finger and the longus palmaris was carried out. The main variable was the failure load in both repair groups. We also evaluated the cross-sectional area (CSA) and the tensile strength of the repairs. Thirty hands were included in our study. There was no significant difference in the failure load between the two groups (116N for group 1 versus 103N for group 2, P=0.2). The CSA was significantly smaller in the step-cut group compared to Pulvertaft group (19.8mm² versus 35mm², P<0.01). The tensile strength was significantly higher in the step-cut group than in the Pulvertaft group (5.3N/mm² versus 3.4N/mm², P<0.01). Early active mobilization requires a minimum repair strength of 75N. In our study, the step-cut suture appears strong enough and thin enough to decrease the fibrosis, which would lead to better functional results. No other study of this type has been published. The specimens in which the repair strength was less than 75N all involved a thin, weak longus palmaris. Other biomechanical studies should be done to define the anatomical criteria required for use of the palmaris longus tendon. The step-cut suture seems to be strong enough and thin enough to provide sufficient proximal attachment during flexor tendon reconstruction to allow early active mobilization.