Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department for Continuing Education, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Including grey literature in systematic reviews enhances evidence analysis by reducing publication bias and providing a more comprehensive, timely, and balanced picture of research findings.
Area of Science:
- Evidence-based practice
- Information science
- Research methodology
Background:
- Systematic reviews require comprehensive evidence identification.
- Grey literature offers valuable data not found in commercial publications.
- Including grey literature can mitigate publication bias and improve review timeliness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the benefits of incorporating grey literature into systematic reviews.
- To provide guidance on searching for and utilizing grey literature.
- To illustrate the contribution of grey literature searches with a practical example.
Main Methods:
- This narrative review synthesizes information on grey literature in systematic reviews.
- It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of grey literature search strategies.
- An illustrative search example is presented.
Main Results:
- Grey literature can include theses, reports, and conference papers.
- It provides a platform for disseminating null or negative results.
- Effective grey literature searching can significantly enhance systematic reviews.
Conclusions:
- The benefits of including grey literature in systematic reviews outweigh the search challenges.
- A well-designed grey literature search strategy is crucial for comprehensive reviews.
- Incorporating grey literature fosters a more balanced and complete body of evidence.
Related Concept Videos
Archival Research
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
