Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

488
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
488
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

590
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
590
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

638
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
638
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

334
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
334
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

325
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
325
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

890
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
890

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Violent victimisation after adolescent traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a clinical prediction model using Welsh national registers.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2026
Same author

Improving suicide prevention in men.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Association of psychotropic medications with the use of coercive measures and recidivism during forensic psychiatric care: a Swedish nationwide register-based study.

BMJ mental health·2026
Same author

Adverse childhood experiences in children and youth experiencing homelessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Lancet. Public health·2026
Same author

Infections and severe mental illness: a population-based matched cohort study.

BMJ mental health·2026
Same author

Improving risk assessment in forensic mental health: Temporal validation and clinical refinement of the FoVOx risk tool.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.2K

Selecting a risk assessment tool to use in practice:a 10-point guide.

Seena Fazel1, Achim Wolf2

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hosptial, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Evidence-Based Mental Health
|December 23, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Choosing the right risk assessment tool is crucial. This perspective offers 10 key questions to guide professionals in selecting validated instruments for practical application, especially in criminal justice.

More Related Videos

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.2K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Criminal Justice
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Numerous risk assessment tools and clinical algorithms are available across scientific and medical fields.
  • The selection of appropriate instruments is critical for effective practical application.
  • Over 200 violence risk assessment tools exist, often mandated in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of research findings to inform the selection of risk assessment instruments.
  • To outline key questions for professionals when choosing a tool for practical use.
  • To offer guidance relevant to public policy and service commissioners.

Main Methods:

  • Review of research findings related to the external validation and development of risk assessment instruments.
  • Identification of 10 critical questions for tool selection.
  • Incorporation of consensus guidelines for reporting research in prognostic models.

Main Results:

  • A framework of 10 questions is presented to aid in the selection of risk assessment tools.
  • Emphasis is placed on the importance of external validation and the instrument's derivation.
  • Guidelines for reporting research on prognostic models are recommended.

Conclusions:

  • Informed selection of risk assessment tools is essential for reliable and valid application.
  • The presented questions and guidelines support evidence-based decision-making for practitioners and policymakers.
  • Adherence to reporting standards enhances the transparency and utility of research on risk assessment instruments.