Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.8K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.8K
Comparative Excretory Systems02:24

Comparative Excretory Systems

26.7K
Animals have evolved different strategies for excretion, the removal of waste from the body. Most waste must be dissolved in water to be excreted, so an animal’s excretory strategy directly affects its water balance.
26.7K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.1K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.1K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

619
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
619
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

17.1K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
17.1K
Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility02:34

Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility

51.8K
Intermolecular forces are attractive forces that exist between molecules. They dictate several bulk properties, such as melting points, boiling points, and solubilities (miscibilities) of substances. Molar mass, molecular shape, and polarity affect the strength of different intermolecular forces, which influence the magnitude of physical properties across a family of molecules.
Temporary attractive forces like dispersion are present in all molecules, whether they are polar or nonpolar. They...
51.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consumption of whole and refined grains and the risk of gastric cancer: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project.

European journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Unlocking the genetic arsenal of Xanthomonas arboricola: new insights into taxonomic classification, pathogenicity and adaptation beyond the effectorome.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

Genome sequencing for the diagnosis of rare disorders: The Brazilian Rare Genomes Project.

HGG advances·2026
Same author

The oral maternal microbiome plays a role in the development of cleft lip and palate condition in children.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

Meta-analysis of 22,710 human microbiome metagenomes defines an oral-to-gut microbial enrichment score and associations with host health and disease.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Endoscopic liquid biopsies of gastric fluid in a large human patient cohort reveal DNA content as a candidate tumor biomarker in gastric cancer.

eLife·2025
Same journal

Isolation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Modeling Melanoma Immune Surveillance by CAR-T Cells in Human Skin Organoids.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Optimization of a Matrigel-Based In Vitro Angiogenesis Assay for Reproducible and Quantifiable 2D-Tube Formation Using HUVECs.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Mechanical Properties of Fresh Ovarian Tissue with Optical Brillouin Microscopy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

3D Chromatin Architecture During Early Development: New Methods and New Findings.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Metabolic Plasticity in Embryogenesis Throughout the Lens of NAD<sup></sup>.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.1K

Comparative Metagenomics.

Andrew Maltez Thomas1,2, Felipe Prata Lima1,3, Livia Maria Silva Moura1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry , University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|December 27, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing metagenomes from different body sites is complex. This study details methods for comparing 16S rRNA and shotgun DNA sequencing data, highlighting key considerations for accurate analysis of microbial communities.

Keywords:
16S rRNAComparative metagenomicsDNA shotgunMetagenomeMicrobiome

More Related Videos

Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries
16:05

Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: May 28, 2007

9.3K
A High Throughput Screen for Biomining Cellulase Activity from Metagenomic Libraries
10:21

A High Throughput Screen for Biomining Cellulase Activity from Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: February 1, 2011

16.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.1K
Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries
16:05

Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: May 28, 2007

9.3K
A High Throughput Screen for Biomining Cellulase Activity from Metagenomic Libraries
10:21

A High Throughput Screen for Biomining Cellulase Activity from Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: February 1, 2011

16.5K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Advances in DNA sequencing technologies have led to a surge in metagenomic datasets from diverse environments, including human body sites.
  • Comparing these large-scale metagenomic datasets presents significant challenges due to data volume and methodological considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe current techniques for comparing metagenomes generated by 16S ribosomal RNA and shotgun DNA sequencing.
  • To emphasize methodological issues crucial for sound comparative metagenomic studies.
  • To illustrate comparative techniques with a case study from the Human Microbiome Project.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current techniques for metagenome comparison using 16S ribosomal RNA and shotgun DNA sequencing data.
  • Detailed case study involving the Human Microbiome Project dataset.
  • Analysis of microbial communities from buccal mucosa and tongue dorsum samples, focusing on alpha diversity, beta diversity, and taxonomic/functional profiles.

Main Results:

  • The study illustrates practical application of comparative metagenomic analysis techniques.
  • Identifies and discusses methodological considerations essential for robust comparisons between different metagenomic datasets.
  • Provides insights into the microbial community differences between buccal mucosa and tongue dorsum.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate comparison of metagenomic datasets requires careful attention to methodological details.
  • The presented techniques and case study offer a framework for analyzing and comparing microbial communities.
  • Understanding these comparisons is vital for advancing microbiome research.