Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standards for qualitative research.

N Burns

    Nursing Science Quarterly
    |January 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Identifying excellence in qualitative studies requires new criteria beyond quantitative measures. Proposed standards include descriptive vividness, methodological congruence, analytic preciseness, theoretical connectedness, and heuristic relevance for robust critique.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Wearing a Fitbit Increases Physical Activity Levels in Women with Gestational Diabetes.

    Irish medical journal·2024
    Same author

    The Experience of the Management of Eating Disorders in a Pop-up Eating Disorder Unit

    Irish medical journal·2018
    Same author

    Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders' experiences.

    Research involvement and engagement·2017
    Same author

    Implementing guidelines and training initiatives to improve cross-cultural communication in primary care consultations: a qualitative participatory European study.

    International journal for equity in health·2017
    Same author

    Porcine factor VIII (Hyate: C®): in vitro stability, microbiological safety and effect of heparin.

    Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2016
    Same author

    Environmental requirements of sealed cabins for space and orbital flights--a second study. Part 1: Rationale and habitability aspects of confinement study.

    [Report no.] NAMC-ACEL-. United States. Air Crew Equipment Laboratory, Philadelphia·2014
    Same journal

    The Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Fatigue Among Burn Patients in Iraq.

    Nursing science quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Scholarly Dialogue: Nursing Sciencing on Human Experiences.

    Nursing science quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Margaret A. Newman and Her Theory Live in Our Nursing Practice.

    Nursing science quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Scholarly Dialogue: Nursing's Future-Philosophy of Science in Nursing.

    Nursing science quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Analysis of Rape Trauma Syndrome Guided by Roy Adaptation Model: Scoping Review.

    Nursing science quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Truth in the Moment: Knowledge Development in Nursing and the Health Sciences.

    Nursing science quarterly·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Social Sciences
    • Research Methodology

    Background:

    • Qualitative studies lack universally accepted criteria for evaluating excellence.
    • Quantitative study criteria are unsuitable due to differing assumptions.
    • Critiquing qualitative research demands specific skills like inductive reasoning and theory analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a set of standards for the critique of qualitative studies.
    • To address the need for context flexibility and advanced reasoning in qualitative analysis.
    • To enhance the identification of high-quality qualitative research.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of five proposed standards: descriptive vividness, methodological congruence, analytic preciseness, theoretical connectedness, and heuristic relevance.
    • Detailed examination of methodological congruence (documentation, procedural, ethical rigor, auditability).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of heuristic relevance (intuitive recognition, relation to knowledge, applicability).

    • Main Results:

    • Five key standards proposed for qualitative study critique.
    • Identification of specific elements within methodological congruence and heuristic relevance.
    • Recognition of threats to proposed standards and need for improved publication strategies.

    Conclusions:

    • Established criteria for quantitative research are inadequate for qualitative studies.
    • The proposed standards offer a framework for evaluating qualitative research rigor and relevance.
    • Enhanced presentation strategies are necessary to facilitate effective critique of qualitative studies.