Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2026

A Human Fallopian Tube Model for Investigation of C. trachomatis Infections
Published on: August 11, 2012
A comparison of the fallopian tube's response to overt and silent salpingitis
D L Patton1, D E Moore, L R Spadoni
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract:
We examined two groups of infertile women who underwent microsurgical repair of their fallopian tube(s) for distal tubal obstruction, one with a history of salpingitis (overt pelvic inflammatory disease) (N = 34) and one without (silent pelvic inflammatory disease) (N = 25). Nine women with normal tubes undergoing hysterectomy and salpingectomy served as controls. Tubal biopsy specimens were studied by light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy to assess tubal damage. Morphologic damage was scored 0-9, with 0 representing normal tubal architecture and 9 assigned to severe tubal damage. The mean score (+/- SEM) in women with overt pelvic inflammatory disease was 4.2 +/- 0.4; in women with silent pelvic inflammatory disease, 4.3 +/- 0.4; and in the control group, 0.76 +/- 0.2 (P less than .001). Fallopian tube abnormalities seen in women with overt and silent pelvic inflammatory disease included flattened mucosal folds, extensive deciliation, and degeneration of secretory epithelial cells, morphologic changes that are similar to the cellular changes observed in our experimental Chlamydia trachomatis infections in monkeys. Laser light-scattering spectroscopy was used to measure the ciliary activity of the epithelial cells. Ciliary beat frequency was significantly reduced in women with overt pelvic inflammatory disease (N = 13; f = 6.4 +/- 1.2 Hz) and in women with silent pelvic inflammatory disease (N = 11; f = 7.2 +/- 1.2 Hz) as compared with the controls (N = 5; f = 23.4 +/- 1.5 Hz) (P less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Uterine Tubes
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis

