Evaluation of the Influenza Risk Reduction from Antimicrobial Spray Application on Porous Surfaces

Alexandre Chabrelie1, Jade Mitchell1, Joan Rose2

  • 1Department of Biosystem and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Insights

Antimicrobial sprays significantly reduce influenza A infection risk on porous surfaces. This study demonstrates a four-log reduction in risk, crucial for environmental management strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Infectious disease epidemiology
  • Risk assessment

Background:

  • Influenza A poses a significant public health threat, causing substantial deaths and hospitalizations annually in the US.
  • Surface contamination and subsequent hand transfer are recognized routes for influenza A transmission.
  • Current disinfection methods often focus on hard surfaces and laundering, leaving gaps for other materials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of antimicrobial sprays in reducing influenza A infection risk on porous fomites.
  • To develop and utilize a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model for evaluating disinfection strategies.
  • To compare infection risks associated with treated versus untreated porous surfaces.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a stochastic risk model using quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA).
  • Laboratory analysis of antimicrobial spray efficacy on porous surfaces.
  • Modeling of infection risk for single and multiple touch scenarios on treated and untreated fomites.

Main Results:

  • Antimicrobial spray application reduced influenza A infection risk by up to four logs on porous surfaces.
  • Median risk decreased from 1.25 × 10⁻⁴ (untreated) to 3.6 × 10⁻⁸ (treated) per single touch.
  • The study provides a generalizable model for comparing disinfection scenarios over time and contact rates.

Conclusions:

  • Antimicrobial sprays are effective in mitigating influenza A transmission risk via porous fomites.
  • These findings expand risk management strategies for influenza A, particularly for non-launderable items.
  • Effective disinfection of fomites complements existing public health measures against influenza A.

Related Concept Videos

Antimicrobial Effectiveness01:28

Antimicrobial Effectiveness

The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
1.1K
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions03:11

Oxidation-Reduction Reactions

Oxidation–Reduction Reactions
75.9K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K
Antimicrobial Proteins01:23

Antimicrobial Proteins

Antimicrobial proteins are important components of the immune system. They aid the body in combating pathogens by either killing them directly or hindering their replication processes. Four main types of antimicrobial substances are interferons, the complement system, iron-binding proteins, and antimicrobial proteins.
Interferons
Interferons (IFNs) are proteins produced by lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts infected with viruses. While IFNs cannot prevent viruses from entering and...
14.6K
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
13.9K
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia01:30

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia

Depending on the target organ, local anesthetics (LAs) can be administered via various routes. In surface anesthesia, LAs are applied directly to the surface of the skin or mucous membranes. It is widely used for topical skin numbing before venipuncture or minor surgical procedures. Commonly used surface local anesthetics are lidocaine or benzocaine sprays or creams. Surface anesthesia occurs within 5 minutes and lasts for about 60 minutes. One of the main disadvantages of topical anesthesia is...
2.2K