Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Fabrication, Operation and Flow Visualization in Surface-acoustic-wave-driven Acoustic-counterflow Microfluidics
Published on: August 27, 2013
On a time domain boundary integral equation formulation for acoustic scattering by rigid bodies in uniform mean flow
Fang Q Hu1, Michelle E Pizzo1, Douglas M Nark2
1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA.
Abstract:
It has been well-known that under the assumption of a uniform mean flow, the acoustic wave propagation equation can be formulated as a boundary integral equation. However, the constant mean flow assumption, while convenient for formulating the integral equation, does not satisfy the solid wall boundary condition wherever the body surface is not aligned with the assumed uniform flow. A customary boundary condition for rigid surfaces is that the normal acoustic velocity be zero. In this paper, a careful study of the acoustic energy conservation equation is presented that shows such a boundary condition would in fact lead to source or sink points on solid surfaces. An alternative solid wall boundary condition, termed zero energy flux boundary condition, is proposed that conserves the acoustic energy and a time domain boundary integral equation is derived. Furthermore, stabilization of the integral equation by Burton-Miller type reformulation is presented. The stability is studied theoretically as well as numerically by an eigenvalue analysis. Numerical solutions are also presented that demonstrate the stability of the current formulation.
Related Concept Videos
Equation of Motion for a Rigid Body
The combined moments generated about the center of mass of the object are equal to the rate of change of the angular momentum of the body. An external force, when applied at a different...
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Angular Momentum: Rigid Body
This calculation can get complicated when tiny particles within the rigid body are not rotating in the same plane but have...
Virtual Work for a System of Connected Rigid Bodies
Next,...
Kinetic Energy for a Rigid Body

