Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Evaluation of Microfluidics-FISH method in prenatal diagnosis
Aleksandra Pietrzyk, Małgorzata Ryłów, Marta Bryśkiewicz
1Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Cytogenetic Unit, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland. jgron@pum.edu.pl.
Microfluidics-FISH offers a rapid, cost-effective method for detecting common aneuploidies in prenatal diagnosis, using smaller amniotic fluid samples. While effective, it complements, rather than replaces, traditional karyotyping.
Area of Science:
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Cytogenetics
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Classical cytogenetic analysis is the standard for invasive prenatal diagnosis.
- Novel methods like Microfluidics-FISH are emerging for faster aneuploidy detection.
- FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) is a key molecular technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of Microfluidics-FISH against classical karyotyping and Rapid FISH.
- To evaluate Microfluidics-FISH for detecting common aneuploidies in prenatal samples.
- To assess turnaround time and sample volume requirements.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 52 amniotic fluid samples.
- Performed classical cytogenetic analysis (karyotyping).
- Utilized Microfluidics-FISH and standard Rapid FISH for aneuploidy screening (trisomies 21, 13, 18, sex chromosome aberrations).
Main Results:
- Microfluidics-FISH and Rapid FISH identified chromosomal aberrations in 9 out of 52 samples, consistent with karyotyping.
- Classical karyotyping detected one additional case of a small supernumerary marker chromosome.
- Microfluidics-FISH demonstrated the shortest turnaround time and smallest average sample volume, proving reliable and cost-effective for common aneuploidies.
Conclusions:
- Microfluidics-FISH is a reliable and cost-effective rapid testing method for common aneuploidies in prenatal diagnosis.
- The method requires a significantly smaller sample volume and offers a shorter turnaround time.
- FISH-based methods, including Microfluidics-FISH, have limitations and cannot solely replace conventional karyotyping for comprehensive diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Osmoregulation in Fishes
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...

