Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Long-Term Survival With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Different Symptomatic Functional Classes of Heart
Yitschak Biton1, Spencer Rosero2, Arthur Moss2
1Division of Cardiology, Heart Research Follow-Up Program, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy offers significant long-term survival benefits for patients with reduced ejection fraction after myocardial infarction. This benefit persists regardless of heart failure symptoms, supporting broader ICD use in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Current guidelines differ on primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use for patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤30%).
- American guidelines recommend ICD for LVEF ≤30% irrespective of heart failure (HF) symptoms.
- European guidelines restrict ICD indication to symptomatic HF (NYHA class ≥II).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term survival advantage of primary ICD therapy in post-myocardial infarction patients with LVEF ≤30%.
- To compare ICD effectiveness across different New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes (I, II, III) in the MADIT-II trial.
- To determine if HF symptoms influence the mortality benefit of ICD therapy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1,164 patients from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II) with LVEF ≤30%.
- Patients were stratified by baseline NYHA class (I, II, III).
- Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyzed 8-year mortality risk reduction with ICD vs. non-ICD therapy.
Main Results:
- At 8 years, cumulative mortality in the non-ICD arm was 57% for NYHA I, 57% for NYHA II, and 76% for NYHA III.
- ICD therapy demonstrated a consistent, significant mortality risk reduction across all evaluated NYHA classes (NYHA I: HR 0.63; NYHA II: HR 0.68; NYHA III: HR 0.68).
- No significant interaction was found between NYHA class and treatment arm, indicating similar ICD benefit regardless of HF symptom severity.
Conclusions:
- Primary ICD therapy provides a consistent long-term survival benefit for patients with previous myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction.
- The mortality benefit of ICDs in this population is independent of the presence or severity of heart failure symptoms.
- Findings support the American guideline recommendation for primary ICD use in patients with LVEF ≤30% regardless of HF symptoms.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

