Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Improving Sleep Disturbances in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and
Dimitrios Papadopoulos1, Apostolos Papadoudis1, Maria Kiagia1
1Oncology Unit, 3rd Department of Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Sotiria" Regional Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Context:
Lung cancer patients experience higher levels of sleep disturbances compared to other cancer patients, and this leads to greater distress, poorer function, and lower quality of life. Nonpharmacologic interventions have demonstrated improvements in the context of breast cancer, but their efficacy in the lung cancer population is unclear.
Objectives:
The aim of this review was to determine the effects of any nonpharmacologic intervention on sleep quality of lung cancer patients.
Methods:
Intervention studies of any design that reported primary or secondary outcomes on sleep quality were included. Databases searched were Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases.
Results:
Twenty-two studies were identified with a total of 1272 participants. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was the most common instrument used. Statistically significant results were observed for all intervention categories examined in the short-term follow-up period: exercise and rehabilitation programs (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.43, 95% CI: -0.68, -0.19, P = 0.0005); information, psychoeducation, and symptom screening interventions (SMD: -0.87, 95% CI: -1.21, -0.54, P < 0.00001); and mind-body interventions (SMD: -0.88, 95% CI: -1.59, -0.16, P = 0.02). However, effectiveness was lower and nonsignificant when evaluated over one month after completion.
Conclusion:
Limitations include the high heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures, in addition to small sample sizes and high risk of bias within studies. Because they do not allow for a clear interpretation of the results, it is recommended that every patient should be assessed individually to guide a possible referral.
More Related Videos
08:32Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Published on: October 2, 2020
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Ecological Disturbance
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Insufficient Sleep and Sleep Deprivation
Sleep deprivation is a more severe form of sleep loss...
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...