Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.3K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.3K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

10.1K
10.1K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.3K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.3K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.2K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

2.0K
2.0K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.7K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional reserve mitigates cognitive-motor dual-task costs in older adults: insights from age, cohort, and behavioural strategies.

European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity·2026
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Challenging the Biomimetic Promise 2.0: Negative Spillover of Bio-Inspired Versus Sustainability Framing on Public Perceptions of Bio-Inspired Technologies.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Cultural differences in healthcare: An investigation using cognitive-affective mapping.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

Continuous Hand-Arm Vibrations Do Not Interfere with Cognitive Processing.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Bindings for Action: Bridging the Gap Between Theories of Procedural Working Memory and Action Control Research.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Visualization of HIV-1 Gag Binding to Giant Unilamellar Vesicle GUV Membranes
08:21

Visualization of HIV-1 Gag Binding to Giant Unilamellar Vesicle GUV Membranes

Published on: July 28, 2016

9.4K

Intentional binding of visual effects.

Miriam Ruess1, Roland Thomaschke2, Andrea Kiesel2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany. ruess@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|January 12, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Intentional binding (IB), a measure of agency, shows that actions make effects seem to occur sooner. Visual effects demonstrate IB, but it is weaker than auditory effects.

Keywords:
Clock paradigmEffect delayEffect modalityIntentional bindingSense of agencyTemporal bindingVisual effects

More Related Videos

Improved Visualization and Quantitative Analysis of Drug Effects Using Micropatterned Cells
15:41

Improved Visualization and Quantitative Analysis of Drug Effects Using Micropatterned Cells

Published on: December 2, 2010

18.0K
A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
11:14

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Visualization of HIV-1 Gag Binding to Giant Unilamellar Vesicle GUV Membranes
08:21

Visualization of HIV-1 Gag Binding to Giant Unilamellar Vesicle GUV Membranes

Published on: July 28, 2016

9.4K
Improved Visualization and Quantitative Analysis of Drug Effects Using Micropatterned Cells
15:41

Improved Visualization and Quantitative Analysis of Drug Effects Using Micropatterned Cells

Published on: December 2, 2010

18.0K
A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
11:14

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Intentional binding (IB) measures the sense of agency by assessing the temporal perception of action-effect relationships.
  • The classic clock paradigm typically uses auditory stimuli to investigate IB.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate intentional binding (IB) for visual action effects.
  • To compare IB for visual versus auditory action effects.
  • To explore the influence of effect delay on IB for both visual and auditory stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Modified the classic clock paradigm to incorporate visual action effects.
  • Conducted two experiments comparing visual and auditory action effects.
  • Measured participants' time point estimates for action effects.

Main Results:

  • Visual action effects exhibited intentional binding, with perceived effects shifted towards the time of action.
  • The magnitude of IB was dependent on the delay duration between action and effect, with shorter delays showing stronger IB.
  • Overall IB was weaker for visual effects compared to auditory effects.

Conclusions:

  • Intentional binding occurs for both visual and auditory action effects.
  • The strength of IB is modulated by the temporal delay between action and effect.
  • Differences in IB strength between visual and auditory effects may have implications for human-machine interface design.