[Clinical features and surgical outcomes of acute acquired comitant esotropia]

Objective: To investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients with acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) type Ⅱ(AACE-Ⅱ) and type Ⅲ (AACE-Ⅲ). Methods: Retrospective case series analysis. Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent strabismus surgery for AACE-Ⅱ and AACE-Ⅲ in Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University between January 2011 and June 2016 with a minimum follow-up time of 3 months were collected. Each patient underwent a complete ophthalmological and orthoptic examination to exclude esotropia resulting from other reasons, and a systemic assessment to exclude AACE related to intracranial and systemic diseases. Surgical procedures were determined according to the esodeviations measured at distance and near and the different dominant eye of patients. A successful surgical alignment was defined as the distant and near deviation in the primary gaze within 8 prism diopters (PD) of orthophoria and no diplopia. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study, including 17 males and 12 females. The mean age of the patients was 22.14±15.13 years (range, 5-63 years). The median corrected visual acuity (LogMAR) of patients with AACE-Ⅱwas 0 (range, 0.22 to 0), and that of patients with AACE-Ⅲ was 0 (range, 0.10 to 0). The median esodeviation of patients with AACE-Ⅱ at distance was 35 PD (range, 10 to 55 PD), and that at near was 35 PD (range, 20 to 60 PD). The median esodeviation of patients with AACE-Ⅲ at distance was 30 PD (range, 12 to 50 PD), and that at near was 30 PD (range, 6 to 50 PD). When tested with the red filter test preoperatively, all the patients had an uncrossed horizontal diplopia with the same distance in left and right lateral fixations. With a mean follow-up time of 12.0±12.6 months, of all the 29 patients, 24 patients (83%) achieved successful surgical alignment after one surgery, and 5 patients (17%) were undercorrected or had recurrence, in whom 4 were successfully aligned after repeated surgery (performed at a mean of 3.5 months after the first surgery) and 1 was treated with the Fresnel press-on prism. At the last follow-up, of all the 28 patients successfully aligned, 20 (71%) regained bifoveal fusion, 8 (29%) regained peripheral fusion, 17 (61%) regained normal stereopsis (stereoacuity ≤60"), and 11 regained a certain degree of stereopsis (stereoacuity 80"-400"). The constituent ratio of biocular central fusion and peripheral fusion in patients with AACE-Ⅱ had no significant difference from patients with AACE-Ⅲ (χ(2)=0.235, P>0.05), and the constituent ratio of central stereopsis, macular stereopsis, and peripheral stereopsis in patients with AACE-Ⅱ had no significant difference from patients with AACE-Ⅲ (χ(2)=0.762, P>0.05). Conclusions: All patients exhibited the typical features of AACE, which included an acute onset of diplopia and comitant esotropia, a wide range of onset age of the patients, normal corrected visual acuity and ocular movements, a mean moderate level of esodeviation with a wide range, and a good binocular potential. According to the esodeviations measured at distance and near and the different dominant eye of patients, good oculomotor alignment and perceptual outcomes may be obtained in patients with AACE-Ⅱand AACE-Ⅲ. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2017, 53: 908-916).