Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Functional Interrogation of Adult Hypothalamic Neurogenesis with Focal Radiological Inhibition
Published on: November 14, 2013
Advantages and Disadvantages in Image Processing with Free Software in Radiology
Katrin Muradas Mujika1, Juan Antonio Juanes Méndez2, Andrés Framiñan de Miguel3
1University Healthcare Complex of Salamanca, Paseo San Vicente 58-182, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. katrin.muradas@gmail.com.
This study compares commercial radiology workstations (VITREA2®, AW VolumeShare 5®) with free, open-source software (OsiriX®, 3D Slicer®) for medical image visualization and manipulation. It highlights the trade-offs between cost, features, and usability in advanced radiological studies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Computer Science
Background:
- Sophisticated software enables medical image visualization and manipulation, crucial for teaching and radiology.
- Free Open Source Software (FOSS) like OsiriX® and 3D Slicer® offers accessible options but has limitations.
- Commercial radiology workstations provide advanced features for processing multidimensional images from CT, MRI, and PET scans.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the advantages and disadvantages of various radiological image visualization systems.
- To compare commercial radiology workstations with FOSS applications for advanced radiological study management.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of features between commercial workstations (VITREA2®, AW VolumeShare 5®) and FOSS applications (OsiriX®, 3D Slicer®).
- Evaluation of systems based on their capabilities in image manipulation and post-processing for radiological studies.
Main Results:
- Commercial workstations offer advanced capabilities but come with significant costs and provider-dependent restrictions.
- FOSS applications are freely available but may have limitations in functionality for complex radiological tasks.
- Both systems have distinct advantages and disadvantages impacting the advanced management of radiological studies.
Conclusions:
- The choice between commercial and FOSS radiology workstations depends on specific needs, budget, and required functionalities.
- Further development in FOSS may bridge the gap in advanced medical image processing capabilities.
- Understanding the trade-offs is essential for optimizing radiological workflow and study management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
GIS Software, Hardware, and Sources of GIS Data
Parallel Processing

