Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Load-Power Relationship During a Countermovement Jump: A Joint Level Analysis.
Kym J Williams1,2,3, Dale W Chapman2,4, Elissa J Phillips5
1Strength and Conditioning, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Australia.
This study found that the optimal barbell load for maximizing power during a countermovement jump (CMJ) varies by individual athlete and joint. Prescribing varied loads can enhance both joint and system power during CMJ training.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- The countermovement jump (CMJ) is a fundamental athletic movement used to assess lower-body power.
- Understanding the relationship between external load and power output at the joint and system level is crucial for optimizing training.
- Previous research has shown varying optimal loads for CMJ performance, suggesting individual differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different relative barbell loads affect peak power at the hip, knee, and ankle joints during a CMJ.
- To analyze the joint-level and system-level load-power relationships during the CMJ.
- To determine if athlete-specific factors influence the load-power profile in the CMJ.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-three male athletes performed CMJs with relative barbell loads ranging from 0% to 40% of their estimated 1RM.
- Ground reaction forces and joint kinematics were measured using force plates and a 16-camera motion capture system.
- Peak power for the hip, knee, and ankle joints, as well as system power, were calculated at each load condition.
Main Results:
- Peak power for the hip, knee, and ankle joints was maximized at different relative loads (e.g., hip at 20%, knee at 0-20%, ankle at 40%).
- A significant negative correlation was found between system peak power and knee peak power.
- The timing of peak system and hip power shifted closer to toe-off as external load increased.
Conclusions:
- Lower-body joint power generation during the CMJ is influenced by external load and individual athlete characteristics.
- The load-power profile differs across joints and between athletes, affecting overall system power.
- Training recommendations include using a combination of varied barbell loads (% of 1RM) to optimize joint and system power during CMJ performance.
Related Concept Videos
Hydraulic Jump: Problem Solving
Hydraulic Jump
Relationship Formation
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints
There are two types of cartilaginous joints:
Synchondrosis
A synchondrosis ("joined by cartilage") is a cartilaginous joint where bones are connected by hyaline cartilage. Synchondrosis may be temporary...

