Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

CRISPR Gene Editing Tool for MicroRNA Cluster Network Analysis
Published on: April 25, 2022
Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks
David Melamed1, Ashley Harrell2, Brent Simpson3
1Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210; melamed.9@osu.edu bts@sc.edu.
Social network structure significantly influences human cooperation. Dynamic networks and individual partner choices, rather than reputation alone, drive cooperation by fostering clustered relationships.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Behavioral Economics
- Network Science
Background:
- Human cooperation is fundamentally linked to social networks.
- Network clustering, where individuals form tightly connected groups, is a key factor promoting cooperation by protecting conditional cooperators.
- Dynamic networks, allowing for relationship changes, can facilitate the emergence of cooperation clusters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To disentangle the effects of network dynamics and reputation on cooperation.
- To investigate how network clustering and dynamics influence cooperation in a large-scale experiment.
- To examine the impact of individual partner choices versus a single group decision on cooperation rates.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale experiment (n=2,675) with participants in static or dynamic networks, which were either clustered or random.
- Inclusion of varying levels of reputational information.
- Comparison of cooperation rates under individual partner choice versus a single group decision.
Main Results:
- Initial network clustering predicted cooperation in static networks but not dynamic ones.
- Reputation influenced partner choice, but cooperation levels were primarily driven by network dynamics.
- When participants made individual choices, cooperation rates in static networks matched those in dynamic networks.
Conclusions:
- Network dynamics, particularly when allowing for individual partner choices, are crucial for sustained cooperation.
- Structured social relations, enabled by individual decision-making, are as effective as dynamic networks in promoting cooperation.
- Future research should consider realistic individual choices when studying cooperation in networks.
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Law of Independent Assortment

