Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition
Published on: August 18, 2022
Dermoscopy vs. reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna
E Cinotti1,2, B Labeille1, S Debarbieux3
1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of St-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Background:
Several dermoscopic and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) diagnostic criteria of lentigo maligna (LM)/lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) have been identified. However, no study compared the diagnostic accuracy of these techniques.
Objective:
We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM for LM/LMM using a holistic assessment of the images.
Methods:
A total of 223 facial lesions were evaluated by 21 experts. Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical, dermoscopic and RCM examination was compared. Interinvestigator variability and confidence level in the diagnosis were also evaluated.
Results:
Overall diagnostic accuracy of the two imaging techniques was good (area under the curve of the sROC function: 0.89). RCM was more sensitive (80%, vs. 61%) and less specific (81% vs. 92%) than dermoscopy for LM/LMM. In particular, RCM showed a higher sensitivity for hypomelanotic and recurrent LM/LMM. RCM had a higher interinvestigator agreement and a higher confidence level in the diagnosis than dermoscopy.
Conclusion:
Reflectance confocal microscopy and dermoscopy are both useful techniques for the diagnosis of facial lesions and in particular LM/LMM. RCM is particularly suitable for the identification of hypomelanotic and recurrent LM/LMM.
Related Concept Videos
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy
Reflection of Waves
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Reflective Property of Parabolas

