Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Convention01:30

Sign Convention

3.6K
When analyzing a beam subjected to various loads, it is crucial to understand the internal forces and moments generated within the structure. These internal forces can be broadly classified into normal forces, shear forces, and bending moments. To determine these forces and moments, we use the method of sections and apply a specific sign convention based on their direction and the side of the section being analyzed.
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
3.6K
Signs of Puberty01:27

Signs of Puberty

1.6K
Puberty is a critical phase, typically beginning between the ages of 8 and 13 in girls and 9 and 14 in boys, though timing can vary based on genetics, environmental factors, and overall health. This period is characterized by the development of secondary sexual characteristics and the attainment of reproductive potential. Endocrine changes underpin puberty, with hormonal surges of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) instigated by Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)...
1.6K
Introduction to the Sign Test01:10

Introduction to the Sign Test

1.4K
The sign test is an important tool in nonparametric statistics, offering a straightforward yet effective method for analyzing matched pairs, nominal data, or hypotheses concerning the median of a population. It transforms data points into positive or negative signs, avoiding the need for assumptions about data distribution and instead focusing on the direction of change. It is particularly valuable when data does not conform to the normal distribution requirements of many parametric tests. For...
1.4K
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

45.5K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
45.5K
Introduction to Vital Signs01:25

Introduction to Vital Signs

8.8K
Vital signs are physiological measurements that help key into the status of the body's essential functions. These include body temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure, commonly abbreviated as T, P, R, and BP. Some healthcare settings also consider oxygen saturation (SpO2) and, in specific contexts, pain and level of consciousness as additional vital signs.
Vital signs help healthcare professionals assess an individual's well-being and detect any functional changes...
8.8K
Sign Test for Nominal Data01:12

Sign Test for Nominal Data

418
The sign test is a nonparametric method used to evaluate hypotheses about the median of a single sample or to compare the medians of two related samples. The sign test is particularly useful when dealing with nominal data, which includes distinct categories without an inherent order, such as names, labels, and preferences. Nominal data restricts statistical analysis to evaluating population proportions rather than mean or median values that require continuous data.
For example, consider a...
418

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual optimization of language: Evidence from American Sign Language.

Cognition·2022
Same author

The Conceptualization of Space: <i>Places</i> in Signed Language Discourse.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same author

What is the Source of Bilingual Cross-Language Activation in Deaf Bilinguals?

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2019
Same journal

The cognitive foundations of children's culture.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Let the kids play: Children's folklore, Newell's paradox, and the triviality barrier.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Variable cultural acquisition costs may explain contextual variation in peer cultures.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

What's special about peer cultures? The opportunity for disagreement.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

The adaptive role of peer culture is shaped by risk landscapes.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Hidden cultures: How parental control shapes children's cultural adaptation in East Asian societies.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.3K

Gesture or sign? A categorization problem.

Corrine Occhino1, Sherman Wilcox1

  • 1Department of Linguistics,University of New Mexico,Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001.cocchino@unm.eduwilcox@unm.eduhttp://www.unm.edu/~wilcox.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|January 19, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study challenges the formalist view of language by proposing that the distinction between language and gesture is a categorization problem, not based on objective criteria for gradience.

More Related Videos

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.3K
Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
12:00

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
07:18

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.3K
Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.3K
Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
12:00

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Formalist theories of language posit objective criteria to distinguish language from gesture.
  • This approach often categorizes gradient aspects of signs as gesture.
  • Usage-based theories, however, assert that all linguistic units exhibit gradience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the formalist distinction between language and gesture.
  • To propose an alternative framework for understanding the language-gesture boundary.
  • To re-evaluate the role of gradience in linguistic and gestural communication.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of formalist and usage-based linguistic theories.
  • Examination of criteria used to differentiate language and gesture.
  • Theoretical proposal reframing the language-gesture distinction.

Main Results:

  • Formalist approaches impose an artificial dichotomy by classifying gradient signs as gesture.
  • Usage-based theories acknowledge gradience inherent in all linguistic units.
  • The proposed categorization problem offers a more nuanced understanding of the language-gesture interface.

Conclusions:

  • The distinction between language and gesture is not based on objective formal criteria but on categorization.
  • Gradience is a feature of both language and gesture, challenging formalist assumptions.
  • Rethinking the language-gesture boundary as a categorization problem offers new insights into communication.