Related Experiment Videos
Comment on "Flow of wet granular materials: A numerical study"
1University Grenoble Alpes, 3SR, F-38000 Grenoble, France and CNRS, 3SR, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Physical Review. E
|January 20, 2018
Summary
The Khamseh et al. effective stress model shows bias at low pressures due to capillary stress approximation. Re-examining this reveals excellent agreement with an earlier stress expression, validating an empirical result.
Area of Science:
- Granular physics
- Rheology
- Fluid dynamics
Background:
- The effective stress model by Khamseh et al. (Phys. Rev. E 92, 022201) approximates shear stress in wet granular flow.
- This model exhibits increasing bias at low normal pressures.
- The approximation of capillary stress as a spherical tensor is identified as a potential source of error.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the cause of prediction errors in the Khamseh et al. effective stress model at low normal pressures.
- To re-examine the model's predictions by addressing the capillary stress approximation.
- To validate an earlier effective stress expression for wet granular materials.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Khamseh et al. effective stress model.
- Re-evaluation of capillary stress approximation in wet granular flow.
- Comparison of model predictions with simulated steady-state flow data.
Main Results:
- The approximation of capillary stress by a spherical tensor is confirmed as the cause of prediction errors.
- An excellent agreement is found between the simulated data and a previously introduced effective stress expression.
- The study validates a previously unexplained empirical result in granular material flow.
Conclusions:
- The Khamseh et al. model's limitations at low normal pressures are attributed to its capillary stress approximation.
- An alternative effective stress expression provides a more accurate description of wet granular flow.
- This work reinforces the validity of an empirical finding in granular physics.