Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

780
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
780
Parallel Resonance01:23

Parallel Resonance

614
The parallel RLC circuit is an arrangement where the resistor (R), inductor (L), and capacitor (C) are all connected to the same nodes and, as a result, share the same voltage across them. The parallel RLC circuit is analyzed in terms of admittance (Y), which reflects the ease with which current can flow. The admittance is given by:
614
Resistors In Parallel01:23

Resistors In Parallel

6.5K
Resistors are in parallel when one end of all the resistors are connected to a continuous wire of negligible resistance and the other end of all the resistors are also connected to one another through a continuous wire of negligible resistance. In the case of a parallel configuration, the potential drop across each resistor is the same. Current through each resistor can be found using Ohm’s law, I = V/R, where the voltage is constant across each resistor. The sum of the individual currents...
6.5K
Series and Parallel Capacitors01:14

Series and Parallel Capacitors

9.8K
Capacitors, fundamental components in electronic circuits, can be connected in series and/or parallel configurations. Each configuration has different impacts on the overall behavior of the circuit.
First, consider capacitors connected in series to a battery. In this configuration, the plate connected to the battery's positive terminal develops a positive charge, while the plate attached to the negative terminal becomes negatively charged. An equal magnitude of charge is induced on the...
9.8K
Parallel-axis Theorem01:06

Parallel-axis Theorem

8.3K
The parallel-axis theorem provides a convenient and quick method of finding the moment of inertia of an object about an axis parallel to the axis passing through its center of mass. Consider a thin rod as an example. There is a striking similarity between the process of finding the moment of inertia of a thin rod about an axis through its middle, where the center of mass lies, and about an axis through its end using the conventional method. In the conventional method, the concept of linear mass...
8.3K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

17.1K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
17.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quo vadis, BGA? A collaborative EDNAP exercise on the challenges and progress in forensic biogeographical ancestry inference.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

Preparing for Shotgun Sequencing in Forensic Genetics-A Workflow for Analysis of Monozygotic Twins.

Genes·2026
Same author

Mixture Deconvolution with Massively Parallel Sequencing Data: Microhaplotypes Versus Short Tandem Repeats.

Genes·2025
Same author

Probabilities of finding trace profile donors and their paternal relatives in Y-STR reference databases.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2025
Same author

RNA degradation patterns in cardiac tissues kept at different time intervals and temperatures before RNA sequencing.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Interlaboratory exercise to establish proficiency testing for sequencing of forensic STR and SNP markers.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

20.0K

Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries - a comparative study of eight methods.

Christian Hussing1, Marie-Louise Kampmann2, Helle Smidt Mogensen2

  • 1Section of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. christian.hussing@sund.ku.dk.

Scientific Reports
|January 20, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Accurate quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries is crucial. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays provided more reliable sequencing coverage predictions compared to other common methods like spectrophotometry and fluorometry.

More Related Videos

Massively Parallel Reporter Assays in Cultured Mammalian Cells
11:03

Massively Parallel Reporter Assays in Cultured Mammalian Cells

Published on: August 17, 2014

22.5K
Isolation of Adult Spinal Cord Nuclei for Massively Parallel Single-nucleus RNA Sequencing
06:38

Isolation of Adult Spinal Cord Nuclei for Massively Parallel Single-nucleus RNA Sequencing

Published on: October 12, 2018

19.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

20.0K
Massively Parallel Reporter Assays in Cultured Mammalian Cells
11:03

Massively Parallel Reporter Assays in Cultured Mammalian Cells

Published on: August 17, 2014

22.5K
Isolation of Adult Spinal Cord Nuclei for Massively Parallel Single-nucleus RNA Sequencing
06:38

Isolation of Adult Spinal Cord Nuclei for Massively Parallel Single-nucleus RNA Sequencing

Published on: October 12, 2018

19.8K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Accurate quantification of sequencing libraries is essential for reliable next-generation sequencing (NGS) results.
  • Variations in library concentration can lead to uneven coverage and inaccurate data interpretation.
  • A gold standard method for library quantification is currently lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of eight different methods for quantifying next-generation sequencing libraries.
  • To assess the accuracy of library quantification in predicting actual sequencing coverage.
  • To analyze the practical aspects of each quantification method, including cost, time, and workflow.

Main Methods:

  • Quantification of 54 amplicon, 6 capture, and 6 shotgun fragment libraries using eight distinct methods.
  • Included methods: light spectrophotometry (NanoDrop), fluorometry (Qubit), electrophoresis-based instruments (Bioanalyzer, TapeStation, GX Touch, Fragment Analyzer), and quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays (SYBR Green, TaqMan).
  • Quantification of chemically synthesized double-stranded DNA was also performed.

Main Results:

  • Light spectrophotometry (NanoDrop) yielded the highest concentration estimates, followed by Qubit and electrophoresis-based instruments.
  • qPCR assays (SYBR Green, TaqMan) provided the lowest concentration estimates.
  • qPCR assays demonstrated more accurate predictions of sequencing coverage compared to Qubit and TapeStation.

Conclusions:

  • No single method is universally superior; the choice depends on specific needs and priorities.
  • qPCR offers superior accuracy in predicting sequencing coverage, despite lower concentration estimates.
  • Consideration of cost, time, workflow, and multiplexing capability is vital when selecting a library quantification method.