Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in geriatrics : Indications, technique and complications]
1Klinik für Altersmedizin und Frührehabilitation, Marien Hospital Herne - Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Deutschland. rainer.wirth@elisabethgruppe.de.
Insights
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a common procedure, but evidence for its use in older adults is lacking. Guidelines suggest limited use in cases of severe dementia or malnutrition, recommending it only for specific long-term feeding needs.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Geriatric Medicine
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was introduced in 1979 as a minimally invasive technique for gastric fistula creation.
- The suture pull-through method for PEG insertion is widely adopted.
- There is a notable lack of scientific evidence supporting the indications for PEG in geriatric medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the current indications and evidence base for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in geriatric patients.
- To address the uncertainty surrounding PEG use in the elderly population.
- To provide clarity on appropriate use cases for artificial nutrition in older adults.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing guidelines and scientific literature regarding PEG insertion in geriatric patients.
- Analysis of recommendations for tube feeding duration and nutritional support.
- Examination of contraindications and specific patient populations for PEG placement.
Main Results:
- Current guidelines do not recommend PEG insertion for patients with severe dementia and malnutrition.
- Tube feeding is primarily advised as a temporary measure for patients unable to consume oral nutrition for over 3 days.
- PEG insertion is generally recommended only when artificial nutrition is anticipated for over 3-4 weeks or when nasogastric tubes are not tolerated.
Conclusions:
- The evidence base for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) indications in geriatric medicine is limited, leading to uncertainty.
- Current recommendations emphasize temporary use of tube feeding and restrict PEG use in specific patient groups.
- Further research is needed to establish clear evidence-based guidelines for PEG insertion in the elderly.
Abstract:
The technique of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was introduced in 1979 as a semi-invasive approach for children with the need for a gastric fistula in order to avoid an operative intervention. The suture pull-through method was rapidly established and is now omnipresent. Because scientific evidence is broadly missing, there is some uncertainty about the indications in geriatric medicine. Guidelines do not recommend the insertion of a PEG in patients with severe dementia and malnutrition. Tube feeding is mainly recommended as a temporary method for patients who cannot take oral nutrition for more than 3 days or for whom the energy intake for more than 10 days presumably covers less than 50% of their needs, assuming that the overall prognosis is reasonable. Insertion of a PEG is only recommended if artificial nutrition is expected to be necessary for more than 3-4 weeks or if a nasogastric tube is not tolerated.
More Related Videos
03:24Author Spotlight: Development and Application of a Novel Suture Technique for Annular Fibrosus Repair in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy
Published on: January 26, 2024
05:17Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment